If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Restrict the cat"?? That would be "cats", plus a couple of big dogs with
tails that are constantly knocking things over. All in all, I enjoy their company so much that I don't mind the occasional breakage. I can always make more beads and bottles! Interesting side story about how to use broken glass stuff. I used to teach a beginning stained glass to the local bible college, and next door was a pottery class. I noticed one day that the pottery students were visiting our stained glass classroom a lot. It turned out that they were collecting our scraps, the ones that were too small to re-use, and grinding them up. Then they used the powder to line plates, bowls, ashtrays, whatever. They'd fire these, and the results were absolutely beautiful. Like enamel, which I guess it was, or close enough. Has anybody else ever tried this, or seen it done? - Steve R St Louis "vj" wrote in message ... vj found this in rec.crafts.beads, from "Steve Richardson" : ]The line can be pretty blurry, though. Big blown stuff that requires a ]furnace to make and then to anneal -- that's pretty different from ]lampworking all right! But I make small (1-2 inches or less) blown glass ]bottles using the same torch, rods, release, and annealing blanket as I do ]for beads on a mandrel. The only real difference is that I puff once or ]twice down the tube that the glob of molten glass is built on. If my @#$%$# ]cats would just leave the things alone when they're finished, I'd have a lot ]more to show for my efforts! Small-scale blowing is a huge amount of fun ]and everybody should try it at least once. thanks, Steve! the statement is there just so people understand the techniques are different and so they know that what i'm using/referring to are not beads that are "blown". isn't there a way to put your blown bits in a case or cupboard, or something? or restrict the cats to the non-work area? i've been lucky, so far. the cats ignore my beads except to complain with my tray is in my lap and they want the lap. ----------- @vicki [SnuggleWench] (Books) http://www.booksnbytes.com (Jewelry) http://www.vickijean.com ----------- It's not what you take, when you leave this world behind you; it's what you leave behind you when you go. -- Randy Travis |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I thought my ISP deal (mandatory 1-year sign-up to get the "great rates"
they were offering) included free Web site hosting, but it doesn't. I'm a complete idiot when it comes to computers and Web stuff. I've got an el cheapo digital camera around here somewhere but I wouldn't know where or how to post any pictures. I see other people doing it all the time, though. Advice, please? - Steve R St Louis "Christina Peterson" wrote in message news:1064178407.676985@prawn... Can you show us what you do? Tina "Steve Richardson" wrote in message ... On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:27:27 -0700, vj wrote: vj found this in rec.crafts.beads, from "Kandice Seeber" : Lampworked glass beads are not "blown glass", this is a different technique entirely. The line can be pretty blurry, though. Big blown stuff that requires a furnace to make and then to anneal -- that's pretty different from lampworking all right! But I make small (1-2 inches or less) blown glass bottles using the same torch, rods, release, and annealing blanket as I do for beads on a mandrel. The only real difference is that I puff once or twice down the tube that the glob of molten glass is built on. If my @#$%$# cats would just leave the things alone when they're finished, I'd have a lot more to show for my efforts! Small-scale blowing is a huge amount of fun and everybody should try it at least once. - Steve R St Louis |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Don't be too quick to abandon "ethnocentricity" here, it's not entirely a
bad thing. We lost our electronics industries to cheaper imports with perceived higher quality. We lost our steel industry. We lost our rubber industry. We're losing our automotive industry, and I'll go out on a limb and predict that we'll eventually lose our commercial aircraft industry. All because we tend to buy the least-expensive option that doesn't sacrifice quality. That cheaper option may end up being more expensive in the long run, though, if you include the hidden costs of lost jobs and unemployment payments and uninsured hospital patients and the reduced (or no) tax revenues from now-idle American workers. I'm not fanatical about "buy American" (hey, I have a British Triumph in my garage) but in general it's better to buy something that helps the country, even on a tiny scale, than something that doesn't. (Omigawd, he's raving about imports again! Somebody stop him!) Of course there's the other point of view, that workers in a lot of places overseas really need the economic boost that American buying can give, and we're all citizens of a world community. Why aren't these things ever clear-cut and simple? - Steve R "vj" wrote in message ... vj found this in rec.crafts.beads, from Deirdre S. : ]link quality to *skills, materials and ]technique* rather than nationality. Less ethno-centric, dontcha think? okay, that's a possibility. but how am i going to know? how would you categorize it? ----------- @vicki [SnuggleWench] (Books) http://www.booksnbytes.com (Jewelry) http://www.vickijean.com ----------- It's not what you take, when you leave this world behind you; it's what you leave behind you when you go. -- Randy Travis |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
I think you're right ... enamel -is- powdered glass, with some kind of
medium to spread it on the surfaces to be decorated, and/or to hold it in place for the firing step. I agree that enamel is very cool looking. And I like the idea of one art's 'waste' being another art's raw material ... Deirdre On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:21:13 GMT, "Steve Richardson" wrote: Like enamel, which I guess it was, or close enough |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
And I'd love to show my students the differences, too... I look
forward to the 'side by side' photos. Deirdre On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:27:48 -0700, vj wrote: vj found this in rec.crafts.beads, from Kathy N-V : ]If you guys want to use the photos, feel free. cool! what a good idea, Kathy! thank you! ----------- @vicki [SnuggleWench] (Books) http://www.booksnbytes.com (Jewelry) http://www.vickijean.com ----------- It's not what you take, when you leave this world behind you; it's what you leave behind you when you go. -- Randy Travis |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with you, Deirdre.
I would like to note in particular, that art has traditional transcended borders, bcause it reflects humanity, which I feel is a more important catagory than nationality. Tina "Deirdre S." wrote in message ... I hear you. And agree that we need to understand how our buying habits affect our 'home grown' arts and industries. The form of ethnocentricity I hope we avoid is the automatic assumption that what 'we' do is best, what 'we' make is best and what 'we' like to buy is best ... across the boards, and without examining whether it is true in a particular instance, or whether making such assumptions helps or harms us in the long run. I think it really *isn't* simple and clear cut. And I think that we could benefit -eventually- if there was less sweat-shop labor producing cheap consumer goods ... mostly for -us- as the market ... and more economic equity worldwide. It looks 'expensive' to lean in that direction, at first glance, since lots of the cheap goods we take for granted would rise in price. But I think it would make for economics in a different, healthier *spirit*. One that has built in value for maker and consumer alike, no matter where they live, work and buy. I think people who make things would make better things, and people who buy things would value them more. To lots of people, talking about spirit and economics in one sentence is absurd. To me, it makes a lot of sense. Deirdre On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:37:23 GMT, "Steve Richardson" wrote: Of course there's the other point of view, that workers in a lot of places overseas really need the economic boost that American buying can give, and we're all citizens of a world community. Why aren't these things ever clear-cut and simple? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Of course you can distinguish between what's good and what isn't. It's
harder when you don't have the bead in front of you. I think the majority of people here know the difference, and certainly way more than the average consumer. Even lots more than many "educated" consumers. Tina "vj" wrote in message ... vj found this in rec.crafts.beads, from "laura" : ]Which could be a wonderful marketing point. If Vicki wants to, she can ]point out that she has the knowledge to distinguish quality from ]non-quality, in effect saying "Here are the distinctions and there is good ]and bad work to be found in all categories. However, I select only the ]best, so you don't have to worry about that part of it". ye, gods! i doubt i'm anywhere near having that kind of knowledge! to a large extent, i'm trusting that the artists here are being honest with me! [and having watched Nicole work] i think i'm in danger of drowning on this one! glub glub glub ----------- @vicki [SnuggleWench] (Books) http://www.booksnbytes.com (Jewelry) http://www.vickijean.com ----------- It's not what you take, when you leave this world behind you; it's what you leave behind you when you go. -- Randy Travis |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Well, while this is true - I can safely say that lampworking is not an
American industry. So we can't lose it, in my mind. It's art. People all over the world participate in art. -- Kandice Seeber Air & Earth Designs http://www.lampwork.net Don't be too quick to abandon "ethnocentricity" here, it's not entirely a bad thing. We lost our electronics industries to cheaper imports with perceived higher quality. We lost our steel industry. We lost our rubber industry. We're losing our automotive industry, and I'll go out on a limb and predict that we'll eventually lose our commercial aircraft industry. All because we tend to buy the least-expensive option that doesn't sacrifice quality. That cheaper option may end up being more expensive in the long run, though, if you include the hidden costs of lost jobs and unemployment payments and uninsured hospital patients and the reduced (or no) tax revenues from now-idle American workers. I'm not fanatical about "buy American" (hey, I have a British Triumph in my garage) but in general it's better to buy something that helps the country, even on a tiny scale, than something that doesn't. (Omigawd, he's raving about imports again! Somebody stop him!) Of course there's the other point of view, that workers in a lot of places overseas really need the economic boost that American buying can give, and we're all citizens of a world community. Why aren't these things ever clear-cut and simple? - Steve R |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
In article , vj
writes: i stick to American made cars, Really? Have you actually found an American car? My father has been... complaining... for years about the lack of American cars.... Even the ones with American brand names on them are filled with parts made elsewhere, and it's almost impossible to get American made replacement parts.... Kaytee "Simplexities" on www.eclecticbeadery.com http://www.rubylane.com/shops/simplexities |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Steve
Richardson" writes: I noticed one day that the pottery students were visiting our stained glass classroom a lot. It turned out that they were collecting our scraps, the ones that were too small to re-use, and grinding them up. Then they used the powder to line plates, bowls, ashtrays, whatever. They'd fire these, and the results were absolutely beautiful. Like enamel, which I guess it was, or close enough. Has anybody else ever tried this, or seen it done? I did it with cracked marbles, bottle glass and seed beads when I was doing ceramics/pottery back in the 1980s. It will depend on the glazes, the clay(s) and the firing temp, as well as how big the glass chunks are. Usually, I used "Duncan Transparent Gloss" low fire glaze, no matter what clay/temp I was using-- used it to "stick" the glass to the bisque ware, and kind of fill in the spaces between glass chunks. Reds generally burn out, sometimes with a kind of scummy blackening, even at "low fire" (cone 06). Seed beads generally only slump at that temp, but melt in pretty well at high fire (stoneware, cone 5-8); bright colors generally burn out by cone 5. Cone 10 is usually too hot and everything just blurs, and most colors burn out. The one stoneware bowl that I filled about an inch high with cracked glass (mix of bottle and marbles) turned out wonderful, despite the big crack in the glass that developed. It all melted down into a solid "pool" about a 1/2" deep-- looked like a tropical sea tide pool. I figure it cracked because either the ceramic temp cool down process was too fast for glass, or just because it wasn't compatible shrink-ratewise with the stoneware (which was "Duncan white stoneware clay", in case you're interested). Putting little chunks on the rim of a bowl, cup, etc. and letting the melt streak down the sides looks good, too. Kaytee "Simplexities" on www.eclecticbeadery.com http://www.rubylane.com/shops/simplexities |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new question for lampworkers | Kandice Seeber | Beads | 22 | September 14th 03 11:48 PM |
Proposition to lampworkers | KDK | Beads | 3 | August 25th 03 07:07 PM |
Question for the lampworkers | KDK | Beads | 16 | August 10th 03 06:51 PM |
OT (sorta): Quextion for lampworkers | Louis Cage | Beads | 7 | July 30th 03 02:22 PM |
Question for lampworkers | Tink | Beads | 8 | July 26th 03 01:32 AM |