If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Questions on Ingredients
Well just posting has gotten me to the point of ordering ingredients. Now
I'm stuck on which ones. Can anyone tell my why one over the other? Is the more expensive necessarily the better buy (or visa versa)? whiting Snocal 40 whiting Vicron 2511 Wollastonite W10 200M Wollastonite W20 352M Rutile Light Ceramic Rutile Dark Milled Rutile Grandular Neph Syn 270M Minex3 Neph Syn 400M Minex4 Potash Custer Potash G-200 Bentonite Western 200M Bentonite Western 325M Bentonite B Betonite 149 *Flint SIL-CO-SIL 75 (200M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 52 (325M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 40 (400M) * is this what I'm to use for Silica in the MC6G book? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:21:07 GMT, "dkat" wrote:
Well just posting has gotten me to the point of ordering ingredients. Now I'm stuck on which ones. Can anyone tell my why one over the other? Is the more expensive necessarily the better buy (or visa versa)? whiting Snocal 40 whiting Vicron 2511 Wollastonite W10 200M Wollastonite W20 352M Rutile Light Ceramic Rutile Dark Milled Rutile Grandular Neph Syn 270M Minex3 Neph Syn 400M Minex4 Potash Custer Potash G-200 Bentonite Western 200M Bentonite Western 325M Bentonite B Betonite 149 *Flint SIL-CO-SIL 75 (200M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 52 (325M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 40 (400M) * is this what I'm to use for Silica in the MC6G book? First, flint is indeed the form of silica most folks use. Higher mesh numbers (xxxM) indicate finer powders; they have been passed through a mesh with that many threads or wires per inch. Finer powders make glazes that will melt together faster, but I don't really have any experience comparing differences betweeen (say) 325M and 400M... I'd guess this would make no difference to most uses. I tend to mentally divide things into "coarse" and "fine" at around 100M, and wouldn't hesitate to use anything over 200M in a glaze. Prices may differ, so I'd go with what gets the job done most economically. And you might want to get some Gillespie Borate (or some other GB substitute) for those times when you need to get a low-temperature melt and low expansion. There are lots of recipes that call for this (or an "equivalent" frit), so I wouldn't rule it out just yet. Just my $0.02 worth... Bob Masta dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis www.daqarta.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you. I was going to get 3195 and 3134 Frits - will those do? And
which is the Rutile you would use for glazes? This is my current list that I'm trying to whittle it down if you care - G200 Feldspar 12 Custer Feldspar 15 Ferro Frit 3134 50 Ferro Frit 3195 62 Wollastonite 12 Whiting 12 Nepheline Syenite12 OM-4 Ball Clay EPK 12 Silica Talc 9 Spanish Red Iron Oxide 30 Rutile Green Chrome Ox Tin Oxide Titanium Dioxide "Bob Masta" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:21:07 GMT, "dkat" wrote: First, flint is indeed the form of silica most folks use. Higher mesh numbers (xxxM) indicate finer powders; they have been passed through a mesh with that many threads or wires per inch. Finer powders make glazes that will melt together faster, but I don't really have any experience comparing differences betweeen (say) 325M and 400M... I'd guess this would make no difference to most uses. I tend to mentally divide things into "coarse" and "fine" at around 100M, and wouldn't hesitate to use anything over 200M in a glaze. Prices may differ, so I'd go with what gets the job done most economically. And you might want to get some Gillespie Borate (or some other GB substitute) for those times when you need to get a low-temperature melt and low expansion. There are lots of recipes that call for this (or an "equivalent" frit), so I wouldn't rule it out just yet. Just my $0.02 worth... Bob Masta dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis www.daqarta.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Back to this question.... I will have to buy a sieve - I believe I was told
80 mesh.... Is that going to be fine enough? "Bob Masta" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:21:07 GMT, "dkat" wrote: Well just posting has gotten me to the point of ordering ingredients. Now I'm stuck on which ones. Can anyone tell my why one over the other? Is the more expensive necessarily the better buy (or visa versa)? whiting Snocal 40 whiting Vicron 2511 Wollastonite W10 200M Wollastonite W20 352M Rutile Light Ceramic Rutile Dark Milled Rutile Grandular Neph Syn 270M Minex3 Neph Syn 400M Minex4 Potash Custer Potash G-200 Bentonite Western 200M Bentonite Western 325M Bentonite B Betonite 149 *Flint SIL-CO-SIL 75 (200M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 52 (325M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 40 (400M) * is this what I'm to use for Silica in the MC6G book? First, flint is indeed the form of silica most folks use. Higher mesh numbers (xxxM) indicate finer powders; they have been passed through a mesh with that many threads or wires per inch. Finer powders make glazes that will melt together faster, but I don't really have any experience comparing differences betweeen (say) 325M and 400M... I'd guess this would make no difference to most uses. I tend to mentally divide things into "coarse" and "fine" at around 100M, and wouldn't hesitate to use anything over 200M in a glaze. Prices may differ, so I'd go with what gets the job done most economically. And you might want to get some Gillespie Borate (or some other GB substitute) for those times when you need to get a low-temperature melt and low expansion. There are lots of recipes that call for this (or an "equivalent" frit), so I wouldn't rule it out just yet. Just my $0.02 worth... Bob Masta dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis www.daqarta.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"D Kat" wrote in message ... Back to this question.... I will have to buy a sieve - I believe I was told 80 mesh.... Is that going to be fine enough? If you are going to buy only one sieve, buy that 80 mesh. If you are going to buy two, get an 80 and a 120. For coarser than 80, you can always use a piece of (metal) window screening, or a screen material kitchen strainer. I've worked that way for years. Funny, I've never rubbed off my fingerprints though :) Wayne Seidl Key West, Florida, USA North America, Terra Latitude 81.45W, Longitude 24.33N Elevation 3.1 feet (1m) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:49:17 -0400, "wayneinkeywest"
wrote: "D Kat" wrote in message ... Back to this question.... I will have to buy a sieve - I believe I was told 80 mesh.... Is that going to be fine enough? If you are going to buy only one sieve, buy that 80 mesh. If you are going to buy two, get an 80 and a 120. For coarser than 80, you can always use a piece of (metal) window screening, or a screen material kitchen strainer. I've worked that way for years. Funny, I've never rubbed off my fingerprints though :) If you are looking for an inexpensive source for sieve material to make your own, the best place I've found is McMaster-Carr. A 1ft square of most any mesh size is in the 7-8 dollar range. I built a simple square fram from 2x2 lumber and stapled the sieve screen to the face of it, then gave the frame multiple coats of semi-gloss interior latex to seal both the wood and the seam where the screen meets the wood. Works great! McMaster-Carr is at www.mcmaster.com. For an 80 mesh sieve I got part number 85385T869 "Type 304 Stainless Steel Woven Wire Cloth, 80 x 80 mesh, 0.0055 inch wire diameter, 12" x 12" sheet". It was $7.24 one year ago. No minimum order, no "handling" charge. I also got 4 other sizes and the total shipping was only $4.25. Hope this helps! Bob Masta dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis www.daqarta.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Back to this question.... I will have to buy a sieve - I believe I was
told 80 mesh.... Is that going to be fine enough? If you are looking for an inexpensive source for sieve material to make your own, the best place I've found is McMaster-Carr. A 1ft square of most any mesh size is in the 7-8 dollar range. I built a simple square fram from 2x2 lumber and stapled the sieve screen to the face of it, then gave the frame multiple coats of semi-gloss interior latex to seal both the wood and the seam where the screen meets the wood. Works great! It might be easier to get a piece of PVC pipe about 200 mm diameter, and cut off about an 80 mm length. (I scrounged a bit of yellow PVC: is that for gas?) Lay the mesh on it, and run a biggish soldering iron (25 watts is plenty) round the edge, to weld the mesh into the PVC. Then cut round the outer edge, being careful not to leave any strands of the mesh sticking out. The big advantage of a circular frame is that there are no corners to clean out after use. -- Jake Loddington POULTON-LE-FYLDE, Lancashire, England |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Such a wealth of info I don't know where to start. Thank you again. Donna
"Bob Masta" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:49:17 -0400, "wayneinkeywest" wrote: "D Kat" wrote in message ... Back to this question.... I will have to buy a sieve - I believe I was told 80 mesh.... Is that going to be fine enough? If you are going to buy only one sieve, buy that 80 mesh. If you are going to buy two, get an 80 and a 120. For coarser than 80, you can always use a piece of (metal) window screening, or a screen material kitchen strainer. I've worked that way for years. Funny, I've never rubbed off my fingerprints though :) If you are looking for an inexpensive source for sieve material to make your own, the best place I've found is McMaster-Carr. A 1ft square of most any mesh size is in the 7-8 dollar range. I built a simple square fram from 2x2 lumber and stapled the sieve screen to the face of it, then gave the frame multiple coats of semi-gloss interior latex to seal both the wood and the seam where the screen meets the wood. Works great! McMaster-Carr is at www.mcmaster.com. For an 80 mesh sieve I got part number 85385T869 "Type 304 Stainless Steel Woven Wire Cloth, 80 x 80 mesh, 0.0055 inch wire diameter, 12" x 12" sheet". It was $7.24 one year ago. No minimum order, no "handling" charge. I also got 4 other sizes and the total shipping was only $4.25. Hope this helps! Bob Masta dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom D A Q A R T A Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis www.daqarta.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"dkat" wrote in message ... Well just posting has gotten me to the point of ordering ingredients. Now I'm stuck on which ones. Can anyone tell my why one over the other? Is the more expensive necessarily the better buy (or visa versa)? whiting Snocal 40 whiting Vicron 2511 Wollastonite W10 200M Wollastonite W20 352M Rutile Light Ceramic Rutile Dark Milled Rutile Grandular Neph Syn 270M Minex3 Neph Syn 400M Minex4 Potash Custer Potash G-200 Bentonite Western 200M Bentonite Western 325M Bentonite B Betonite 149 *Flint SIL-CO-SIL 75 (200M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 52 (325M) Flint SIL-CO-SIL 40 (400M) * is this what I'm to use for Silica in the MC6G book? Dkat: Bob has already replied on mesh sizes, so I would add that you will get different results from the light rutile, and the rutile granular. You should have both. If a "recipe" doesn't specify, use the light rutile. As far as the feldspars, Custer and G-200. Again, you should have both, and some K4 as well, since different glazes call for different types of 'spar. Personally, I always go with the finest grain I can get. Easier to mix, stays in suspension better. If the price is not that different, that is, since I can always grind it down finer myself and re-sieve it. Best, Wayne Seidl Key West, Florida, USA North America, Terra Latitude 81.45W, Longitude 24.33N Elevation 3.1 feet (1m) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you - scratch the rutile question just posted.... Beginning to feel a
bit more confident (I was fearless until I had kids....) "wayneinkeywest" wrote in message ... Dkat: Bob has already replied on mesh sizes, so I would add that you will get different results from the light rutile, and the rutile granular. You should have both. If a "recipe" doesn't specify, use the light rutile. As far as the feldspars, Custer and G-200. Again, you should have both, and some K4 as well, since different glazes call for different types of 'spar. Personally, I always go with the finest grain I can get. Easier to mix, stays in suspension better. If the price is not that different, that is, since I can always grind it down finer myself and re-sieve it. Best, Wayne Seidl Key West, Florida, USA North America, Terra Latitude 81.45W, Longitude 24.33N Elevation 3.1 feet (1m) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The ten questions I want you to answer | Jalynne | Beads | 19 | June 22nd 04 08:58 PM |
lots of questions about my ring | tert in seattle | Jewelry | 2 | April 15th 04 03:41 AM |
Some additional questions | Steve Lamb | Beads | 15 | April 3rd 04 03:25 PM |
newbie questions | Umberto Ramirez | Polymer Clay | 3 | December 29th 03 05:02 PM |
AD and dumb questions from a newbie | Nathalie Lebreux | Beads | 7 | September 9th 03 09:45 PM |