If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:07:59 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:21:52 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:09:40 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news snip Neither, otherwise they'd be called dry. FFS. Which substance is more likely to be dry? A rough one or a smooth one? Neither. They could be either dry or not. Let's take an example. A rough dry stretch of tarmac. Safe to drive on. A smooth wet slippery stretch of tarmac - unsafe to drive on. Thats balls, obviously a smooth *wet* slippery streatch of tarmac is not going to be dry. Smooth is not the same as wet. Wet things are usually smooth, that's what I'm getting at. Well smooth peanut butter is not wet. -- Phil Kyle™ Uno Dos Tres Cuatro CINCO!!!!!! "Be very aware that my willingness to continue to criticise your sig is infinite." -- Neil Barker |
Ads |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:07 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:10:31 +0100, Shortcake wrote: "Peter Hucker" wrote in message news : On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:16:13 +0100, Phil Kyle : wrote: : : "Shortcake" verbally sodomised in : : : : "Phil Kyle" wrote in message : ... : : I have some too. I hate the stuff tho. : : : I could live on peanutbutter and chocolate. : : : : Wouldn't your feet get sticky? : : And other parts of the anatomy when she lies down. Pervert !!~ Who isn't? The Pope. Yes he is. How so? Unless you consider wearing a dress to be perverted. -- Phil Kyle™ Uno Dos Tres Cuatro CINCO!!!!!! "Be very aware that my willingness to continue to criticise your sig is infinite." -- Neil Barker |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:25 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:22:25 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:10:27 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news snip snip snip Yes, that might be it. I can imagine the wheely bin being blown all over by a jetwash. It's just stupid cleaning a refuse receptacle. He'll be polishing the drains next. I hope that's not a euphemism. For what? Polishing the drains, use your loaf. Dunno what you're on about. Polishing your drains FOR GOD SAKE!!!!!! I hope that **** god doesn't reply again. -- Phil Kyle™ Uno Dos Tres Cuatro CINCO!!!!!! "Be very aware that my willingness to continue to criticise your sig is infinite." -- Neil Barker |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:35:17 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:06:34 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:19:53 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news snip snip snip Which is? 300%. That's ridiculous. Why? Because it's a stupidly large margin of error. It depends on what you're talking about. -- http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com ) ) ) ) /( /( /( ) ) /( ( #) ( #) ( #) /( ) /( ( #) | | | ( #) /( ( #) | |\| ) |\| |\| | ( #) ) | |\| |\| /( |\| |\| |\| | ) /( |\| |\| |\|( #)|\| |\| |\| |\| /( ( #) )|\| |\|,..'.'--|-'-'---'-'...|\|_ |\|) ( #) | /(|\|-)'' ) |\| )''-'\/( | |\|('#) /( /( )\| ) ) /( ( #)-.|\| |\| | ( #) ( #) /(\] /( /( ( #) | |\| |\| |\| | | ( #) ( #) ( #) | |\| |\| |._ |\| |\| |\| | | | |\| |\| ,'| | -'\| |\| |\| |\| |\| |\| |\| |\|-' | | '-'\|.__|\| |\| |\| |\| _|\|.--'' | | @ ''''-'\'---'\'---'\''' @ | | @ @ @ @ | | @@@ @ @ @ @ @@@ | '._ @@@@ @ @ @ @ @@@@ ,' -.._ @@@@@@ @ @ @@@@@@ _.-' '--...___ @@@@@ ___..--'' ''''-------------''''' |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:35:42 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:07:59 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:21:52 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news snip snip snip Neither. They could be either dry or not. Let's take an example. A rough dry stretch of tarmac. Safe to drive on. A smooth wet slippery stretch of tarmac - unsafe to drive on. Thats balls, obviously a smooth *wet* slippery streatch of tarmac is not going to be dry. Smooth is not the same as wet. Wet things are usually smooth, that's what I'm getting at. Well smooth peanut butter is not wet. Of course it is. Leave some out for 48 hours and see what it goes like when it's dry. -- http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com What's the German word for Vaseline? Vienerslide. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:36:04 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:07 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:10:31 +0100, Shortcake wrote: Pervert !!~ Who isn't? The Pope. Yes he is. How so? Well he's different from the normal - ergo he is perverted. Unless you consider wearing a dress to be perverted. Well duh! -- http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com It is bad luck to be superstitious. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:36:37 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:25 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:22:25 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news snip snip snip snip snip I hope that's not a euphemism. For what? Polishing the drains, use your loaf. Dunno what you're on about. Polishing your drains FOR GOD SAKE!!!!!! I hope that **** god doesn't reply again. Is this a well known phrase or saying? -- http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com _....._ ';-.--';' }===={ _.---.._ .' _|_ '. ';-..--'; /:: (_|_` \ `}===={ |:: ,_|_) | .: _|_ '. \::. | /_;:_ (_|_` \ '::_ _-;'--.-';_|_) | ````` }====={ | / .' _|_ '. _.' /:: (_|_` \`` |:: ,_|_) | \::. | / '::_ _.' |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:35:17 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:06:34 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:19:53 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news snip snip snip Which is? 300%. That's ridiculous. Why? Because it's a stupidly large margin of error. It depends on what you're talking about. No it doesn't. -- Phil Kyle™ Uno Dos Tres Cuatro CINCO!!!!!! "Be very aware that my willingness to continue to criticise your sig is infinite." -- Neil Barker |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:35:42 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:07:59 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:21:52 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news snip snip snip Neither. They could be either dry or not. Let's take an example. A rough dry stretch of tarmac. Safe to drive on. A smooth wet slippery stretch of tarmac - unsafe to drive on. Thats balls, obviously a smooth *wet* slippery streatch of tarmac is not going to be dry. Smooth is not the same as wet. Wet things are usually smooth, that's what I'm getting at. Well smooth peanut butter is not wet. Of course it is. Leave some out for 48 hours and see what it goes like when it's dry. Dry smooth peanut butter. -- Phil Kyle™ Uno Dos Tres Cuatro CINCO!!!!!! "Be very aware that my willingness to continue to criticise your sig is infinite." -- Neil Barker |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:36:04 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:08:07 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote: "Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in news On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:10:31 +0100, Shortcake wrote: Pervert !!~ Who isn't? The Pope. Yes he is. How so? Well he's different from the normal - ergo he is perverted. That depends what you mean by normal. He's normal to catholics, probably. Unless you consider wearing a dress to be perverted. Well duh! Even women? -- Phil Kyle™ Uno Dos Tres Cuatro CINCO!!!!!! "Be very aware that my willingness to continue to criticise your sig is infinite." -- Neil Barker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|