Pingy: Brendaaaaaaa...... !

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:47:13 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:05:50 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:35:51 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip

Not AFAIK.

Read through this if you're bored, I can't be bothered finding it.

http://rfc.net/rfc850.html



I've read it already, AFAIC it doesn't state who is responsible for the
mandatory headers. Though I did a little experiment and it looks like
if you omit them then the server slaps one on itself. So either is the
answer. FASCINATING!!!!!!!!!1111111

This post has a date set by me as 1995.

Bugger.

"Plusnet news
441 437 Rejected 2473 000100 TooOld"

At least plusnet know what they're doing.

Setting date to 2015.....

It didn't even bother telling me why this time, just:

"Plusnet news
441 435 "

Hmmm now it's doing it again, with the correct date, I think I got it
confused.



I suppose it depends on how the server is set up. Maybe some want all of
the mandatory headers and others aren't quite so fussy.

Plusnet also appears to have a broken mail server. I often receive spam which is truncated - I get only 4 headers and no body. The plusnet mail server does not insert its received line, I think due to a naughty square bracket inserted intentionally or unintentionally by the spammer. Unfortunately it's so ****ed up I cannot be sure who sent it.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com
http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com

When a clock is hungry, it goes back four seconds.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:47:37 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:05:50 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:35:51 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip

Not AFAIK.

Read through this if you're bored, I can't be bothered finding it.

http://rfc.net/rfc850.html



I've read it already, AFAIC it doesn't state who is responsible for the
mandatory headers. Though I did a little experiment and it looks like
if you omit them then the server slaps one on itself. So either is the
answer. FASCINATING!!!!!!!!!1111111

I read that as "the server slaps itself".


Prevert!

Is that a pervert who has a premature ejaculation problem?


--
http://www.petersparrots.com
http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com

Barber: "Your hair is getting gray."
Customer: "Try cutting a little faster."

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:48:13 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:06:19 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:36:04 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Why not?

You made me have to go get some.


I have some too. I hate the stuff tho.

Now that's just plain silly.



Well, I was hungry. I might try some. Just to see if I like it now.

Now that's also just plain silly.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com
http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com

Rule1:All Microsift pregrmmes ar bodly mad
Rile7:C rale 4
This nate wis rotten am a IBN compater ussing a Macrosaft Spillchucker.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:51:53 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:06:54 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:14:11 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

ah verbally sodomised in
news:3Rbse.17225$2K4.571@trnddc08:

snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Apparently it's some butter that contains peanuts.

Apparently anyone with allergies is extremely thick.
My peanut butter jar has a warning saying it contains peanuts. DUH!
My weetabix packet has a warning saying it contains wheat. DUH!
If I was an allergic person I'd be offended!


If you were an allergic person you'd be ****ed. Everything has a trace
of something or other in it.

the troble with modern medicine is people with problems like this no
longer die off. They're ****ing up evolution.


LOL! You heartless *******.

Correct. Survival of the fittest and all that.

Anyway most allergies are probably because
people are so anal about hygiene, people never build up a sensible immune
system so it goes nuts (er, scuse the pun).

Are you trying to say you never wash?

--
http://www.petersparrots.com
http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com

When all else fails... !@#$%^&* then read the instructions!

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:47:13 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:05:50 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:35:51 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip

Not AFAIK.

Read through this if you're bored, I can't be bothered finding it.

http://rfc.net/rfc850.html



I've read it already, AFAIC it doesn't state who is responsible for
the mandatory headers. Though I did a little experiment and it looks
like if you omit them then the server slaps one on itself. So either
is the answer. FASCINATING!!!!!!!!!1111111

This post has a date set by me as 1995.

Bugger.

"Plusnet news
441 437 Rejected 2473 000100 TooOld"

At least plusnet know what they're doing.

Setting date to 2015.....

It didn't even bother telling me why this time, just:

"Plusnet news
441 435 "

Hmmm now it's doing it again, with the correct date, I think I got it
confused.



I suppose it depends on how the server is set up. Maybe some want all
of the mandatory headers and others aren't quite so fussy.

Plusnet also appears to have a broken mail server. I often receive spam
which is truncated - I get only 4 headers and no body. The plusnet mail
server does not insert its received line, I think due to a naughty
square bracket inserted intentionally or unintentionally by the spammer.
Unfortunately it's so ****ed up I cannot be sure who sent it.


Don't start that billion character line length ****!

--
Phil Kyle™
Uno
Dos
Tres
Cuatro
CINCO!!!!!!

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:47:37 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:05:50 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:35:51 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip

Not AFAIK.

Read through this if you're bored, I can't be bothered finding it.

http://rfc.net/rfc850.html



I've read it already, AFAIC it doesn't state who is responsible for
the mandatory headers. Though I did a little experiment and it looks
like if you omit them then the server slaps one on itself. So either
is the answer. FASCINATING!!!!!!!!!1111111

I read that as "the server slaps itself".


Prevert!

Is that a pervert who has a premature ejaculation problem?



Yes. My friend says.

--
Phil Kyle™
Uno
Dos
Tres
Cuatro
CINCO!!!!!!

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:48:13 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:06:19 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:36:04 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Why not?

You made me have to go get some.


I have some too. I hate the stuff tho.

Now that's just plain silly.



Well, I was hungry. I might try some. Just to see if I like it now.

Now that's also just plain silly.


I seem to recall likeing the crunchy one but not the smooth one, or was it
the other way around.

--
Phil Kyle™
Uno
Dos
Tres
Cuatro
CINCO!!!!!!

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:51:53 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:06:54 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:14:11 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

ah verbally sodomised in
news:3Rbse.17225$2K4.571@trnddc08:

snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Apparently it's some butter that contains peanuts.

Apparently anyone with allergies is extremely thick.
My peanut butter jar has a warning saying it contains peanuts. DUH!
My weetabix packet has a warning saying it contains wheat. DUH!
If I was an allergic person I'd be offended!


If you were an allergic person you'd be ****ed. Everything has a
trace of something or other in it.

the troble with modern medicine is people with problems like this no
longer die off. They're ****ing up evolution.


LOL! You heartless *******.

Correct. Survival of the fittest and all that.


Are you fit?

Anyway most allergies are probably because
people are so anal about hygiene, people never build up a sensible
immune system so it goes nuts (er, scuse the pun).

Are you trying to say you never wash?


I mean hygiene as in dettol and bleaching everything in sight, not so much
personal hygiene.

--
Phil Kyle™
Uno
Dos
Tres
Cuatro
CINCO!!!!!!

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:06:54 +0100, Phil Kyle wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:14:11 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

ah verbally sodomised in
news:3Rbse.17225$2K4.571@trnddc08:

Phil Kyle wrote:
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip

Why not?

What's all this about peanut butter?

Apparently it's some butter that contains peanuts.

Apparently anyone with allergies is extremely thick.
My peanut butter jar has a warning saying it contains peanuts. DUH!
My weetabix packet has a warning saying it contains wheat. DUH!
If I was an allergic person I'd be offended!


If you were an allergic person you'd be ****ed. Everything has a trace of
something or other in it.

the troble with modern medicine is people with problems like this no longer die off. They're ****ing up evolution.

IAWTP.
--
ah

/\_/|
=0-0=
\'I'|
||,,\_
|[,,/,\
|[|,\_,,)
((J(=__/
meow

Phil Kyle wrote:
"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:48:13 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:06:19 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:36:04 +0100, Phil Kyle
wrote:

"Peter Hucker" verbally sodomised in
news
snip
snip
snip
snip
snip

Why not?

You made me have to go get some.


I have some too. I hate the stuff tho.

Now that's just plain silly.



Well, I was hungry. I might try some. Just to see if I like it now.

Now that's also just plain silly.


I seem to recall likeing the crunchy one but not the smooth one, or was it
the other way around.

Now that's /also/ just plain silly.
--
ah

/\_/|
=0-0=
\'I'|
||,,\_
|[,,/,\
|[|,\_,,)
((J(=__/
meow