If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
On 8/6/08 5:21 PM, "lucretia borgia" wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:35:42 GMT, ellice opined: On 8/6/08 11:46 AM, "lucretia borgia" wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:31:06 -0400, Cheryl Isaak opined: As my ex used to say "it's not bragging if it's true". The corollary to which is obviously that it's not insulting if it's true. Given this guy thinks he's the next Wayne Gretsky and a general jerk on and off the ice. The idea a girl, especially a 9 year old one, could beat him in race of that nature is completely infuriating. C As you know, I take little to no interest in hockey but Gretsky was a totally nice person, likewise so is Crosby - the latter is from just across the harbour from Halifax. He's from Mavia country. So if he wants to be like Gretsky, he better smarten up and be more polite. LOL - Gretzky is a great guy off the ice. Always been nice to say "hi" to in the underneath of the arena, etc. But, on the ice he actually was quite well known for being able to get away with plenty of sneaky and not-nice attacks. He could speak some volumes in that smart undertone - and it wasn't all in the best sportsmanlike way. But, not detracting - he's a great guy, great for the sport, etc. Ellice I'll take him long before that brute that ended another man's career, forget his name because I didn't feel he was memorable. Oh - no comparison. Just always find it a bit interesting - public perception versus a little more behind the scenes. We're big Gretzky fans in this household. But, at least in hockey, can never think that anyone is above/beyond the nasty remarks - even if only meant for the opponents' ears. Personally, we've never been Chris Simon fans - as he's so prone to losing his temper and some seriously ugly attacks - like the stick to the head of the laying on the ice Donald Brashear. I think who you're thinking of is Marty McSorley - who IIRC someone picked up after his lengthy suspension. Similarly, after Todd Bertuzzi caused such a horrid injury, and I believe was brought up on criminal charges, after his suspension for a year - he was brought back. Oh, well. Ellice |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
On 8/6/08 6:38 PM, "Jangchub" wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:31:57 GMT, ellice wrote: On 8/6/08 11:16 AM, "Jangchub" wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:11:34 +0100, "Bruce Fletcher (Stronsay, Orkney)" wrote: Lucille wrote: "Cheryl Isaak" wrote I started wondering about the "lure of the open road" when I pulled up next to a Harley with drink holders, a GPS and bluetooth headsets... That's why the Pediatric ICU nurses I knew called them "Donorcycles." Foolish people who treat their bike as their living room and don't wear helmets. Safety helmets have been compulsory for motorcyclists (except for Sikhs) in the UK for several years. And most cyclists seem to wear a helmet of some sort. Two or three years ago, Texas lifted the helmet law and now we have bikers everywhere with no helmets on. However, you are required to wear a helmet under 17 on a bicycle. Does this make any sense? Isn't a motorbike more dangerous? v Head injuries are head injuries. The idea with bicycle helmets is that children aren't mature enough to make the right decision, therefore by mandating bicycle helmets it's made for them. Yes, we all grew up without them - but honestly, my 3 speed Schwinn wasn't going in the same traffic, at the same pace as the 18 and 24 speed bicycles all around now. Not to mention the mountain bikes, off road, etc. So, bike helmets are a good thing - and kid's heads can use the protection. Plus, once any of these protective helmets have been through a big fall - they generally should be replaced (you can see if the plastic has some crazing - like it stretched). Motorbikes - doesn't the helmet law state that you have to be 18 or over to not wear one? Motorized cycles - more dangerous to everyone else in particular, can be more dangerous cause of speed - but if a car rams a bicycle - you're just as smushed. Ellice Oh you may have misread me. I think everyone should wear helmets for bicycles in traffic and motorcycles. I just find it funny they demand them for bicycles, but not for motorcycles. I am not sure about the age of motorcycle riders, you may be right on that one. At least I hope so. I have seen grown ups with children on the back or in front of them with no helmet on. They may be breaking the law, but in my opinion they are putting that child in danger of death or worse, vegetative state. I understood you - just answering with what rationale I could. I'm sure that it is illegal to have a child on a motorcycle without a helmet. Ellice |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
"ellice" wrote in message ... On 8/6/08 6:38 PM, "Jangchub" wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:31:57 GMT, ellice wrote: On 8/6/08 11:16 AM, "Jangchub" wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:11:34 +0100, "Bruce Fletcher (Stronsay, Orkney)" wrote: Lucille wrote: "Cheryl Isaak" wrote I started wondering about the "lure of the open road" when I pulled up next to a Harley with drink holders, a GPS and bluetooth headsets... That's why the Pediatric ICU nurses I knew called them "Donorcycles." Foolish people who treat their bike as their living room and don't wear helmets. Safety helmets have been compulsory for motorcyclists (except for Sikhs) in the UK for several years. And most cyclists seem to wear a helmet of some sort. Two or three years ago, Texas lifted the helmet law and now we have bikers everywhere with no helmets on. However, you are required to wear a helmet under 17 on a bicycle. Does this make any sense? Isn't a motorbike more dangerous? v Head injuries are head injuries. The idea with bicycle helmets is that children aren't mature enough to make the right decision, therefore by mandating bicycle helmets it's made for them. Yes, we all grew up without them - but honestly, my 3 speed Schwinn wasn't going in the same traffic, at the same pace as the 18 and 24 speed bicycles all around now. Not to mention the mountain bikes, off road, etc. So, bike helmets are a good thing - and kid's heads can use the protection. Plus, once any of these protective helmets have been through a big fall - they generally should be replaced (you can see if the plastic has some crazing - like it stretched). Motorbikes - doesn't the helmet law state that you have to be 18 or over to not wear one? Motorized cycles - more dangerous to everyone else in particular, can be more dangerous cause of speed - but if a car rams a bicycle - you're just as smushed. Ellice Oh you may have misread me. I think everyone should wear helmets for bicycles in traffic and motorcycles. I just find it funny they demand them for bicycles, but not for motorcycles. I am not sure about the age of motorcycle riders, you may be right on that one. At least I hope so. I have seen grown ups with children on the back or in front of them with no helmet on. They may be breaking the law, but in my opinion they are putting that child in danger of death or worse, vegetative state. I understood you - just answering with what rationale I could. I'm sure that it is illegal to have a child on a motorcycle without a helmet. Ellice If it's not illegal, it certainly should be. L |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
"Cheryl Isaak" wrote in message ... On 8/7/08 7:36 AM, in article , "lucretia borgia" wrote: On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:06:25 -0400, Cheryl Isaak opined: On 8/6/08 6:41 PM, in article , "lucretia borgia" wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:31:29 -0500, Jangchub opined: Why am I picturing Lucille Ball in the mud, rolling around with an alpaca? Of course this is just a fantasy and I'd never be able to do it unless mister Mark would go along with it and he is more a girly man who does not like dirt, or fixing things, nor has he ever ridden a horse! I don't know you'd be rolling in the mud, rather ducking their spit balls ! Maybe not Lucille Ball, maybe Green Acres or something. Go read "The Egg and I". That will cure you of longing for "the simple life". Cheryl Hee hee, that's a real oldie lol Great book though. Just finished Peyton Place - another golden oldie, but the story still rings true today. Cheryl Does it surprise you as much as it does me that people today seem to think they invented sex and intrique yesterday and it will be the ruination of the world as we know it. Didn't any of those people read books in the past? Lucille |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
On 8/6/08 8:09 PM, "Karen C in California" wrote:
Carey N. wrote: Care to enlighten me about which shape is for which beverage? -- Carey in MA(showing her ignorance....) As I recall, the deeper cups are for coffee and the shallower ones are for tea. In this household, it's all served in mugs. Tea cups are slightly smaller than coffee cups in china services. Also, older sets will have deeper saucers for the tea (slops thing WRT antiques). Anyhow, generally the teacups will be daintier, generally shallower, and the coffee cups are larger and more upright. But, not all the time - some patterns it's just kind of the ~6 oz tea cup and an ~8 oz coffee cup. Demi-tasse cups, smaller, quite upright. My DA collects antique china, and my DM collected tea cups - enough that my SIL & I split her collection. There's a bit of range in the shape, style - but most of them are 19th century, some 18th, maybe 1 or 2 early 20th. My DA has 18th century and 19th century Royal Doulton, and Royal Worcester - plus when she married - they actually had a set of Royal Imari made for themselves as "good" china - complete with hand fluted plates, interiors of bowls and cups painted. It's stunning - if overwhelmeing. Anyhow, I also have a china set (inherited) that has complete servie - including of all things - cream soups, regular soups, tea and coffee cups, etc. It's only about 60 years old, but..... My DF, for many years, would refuse to drink out of anything but cup and saucer, then finally DM got him to do coffee in a mug, but tea stayed in cups and saucers. So, family fun - when we did take-out Chinese - there was always a pot of China Oolong tea, and cups with saucers. Go figure. I love that teapot, and still have it (though it's still packed up). Black, with fine striped enamel decoration in relief. Likely way to good for the brutal use we gave it. Ellice |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
On 8/7/08 1:05 AM, "Dawne Peterson" wrote:
"Karen C in California" wrote As I recall, the deeper cups are for coffee and the shallower ones are for tea. And then, I think, there are also "breakfast cups"...... In this household, it's all served in mugs. My Dad was apparently waaaay ahead of his time---drank his morning coffee from a bowl before anyone in Saskatchewan had heard of latte. Dawne Ah, how very French. I just loved it my first ever morning in France - go down for petit dejeuner (breakfast) - and a hot, perfect baguette with gorgeous butter, and a bowl of coffee! Yum - great café au lait. Interestingly, I found that in my friends, and then beau's, houses they would have a bowl - deep, uaually angled sides, for coffee, but in some of the restaurants/hotels - the bowl would be a huge mug like we sometimes use for soup - with a handle. Bowl shaped, but with the handle and not so angled. Anyhow, of course I brought a set home! Ellice |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
On 8/7/08 7:16 AM, "Cheryl Isaak" wrote:
On 8/7/08 1:05 AM, in article tel, "Dawne Peterson" wrote: "Karen C in California" wrote As I recall, the deeper cups are for coffee and the shallower ones are for tea. And then, I think, there are also "breakfast cups"...... And demitasses and espresso cups and I think there might be a few others Demitasse and espresso cups are the same. However, you can also get "shot" glasses for straight espresso. In this household, it's all served in mugs. My Dad was apparently waaaay ahead of his time---drank his morning coffee from a bowl before anyone in Saskatchewan had heard of latte. Dawne My grandfather used slurp it from the saucer. Drove my grandmother nuts, he was teaching me bad habits. Cheryl How about the pouring the spillage back into the cup? ellice |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
Cheryl Isaak wrote:
"Bruce Fletcher (Stronsay, Orkney)" wrote: My pint (pottery) mug holds a pint of hot, strong, sweet tea. My pint (glass) mug holds a pint of (home brewed) beer. And there is never something else in the pottery mug? I've love to have a decent mug that size. Beer from a pottery mug? Never tried that, might have a go tonight. -- Bruce Fletcher Stronsay, Orkney http://tinyurl.com/3b54af (Remove dentures to reply) |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the peace and quiet is over and so is the stitching time
On 8/7/08 10:35 AM, in article ,
"Lucille" lzoltynospam@now at comcast..net wrote: "Cheryl Isaak" wrote in message ... On 8/7/08 7:36 AM, in article , "lucretia borgia" wrote: On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:06:25 -0400, Cheryl Isaak opined: On 8/6/08 6:41 PM, in article , "lucretia borgia" wrote: On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:31:29 -0500, Jangchub opined: Why am I picturing Lucille Ball in the mud, rolling around with an alpaca? Of course this is just a fantasy and I'd never be able to do it unless mister Mark would go along with it and he is more a girly man who does not like dirt, or fixing things, nor has he ever ridden a horse! I don't know you'd be rolling in the mud, rather ducking their spit balls ! Maybe not Lucille Ball, maybe Green Acres or something. Go read "The Egg and I". That will cure you of longing for "the simple life". Cheryl Hee hee, that's a real oldie lol Great book though. Just finished Peyton Place - another golden oldie, but the story still rings true today. Cheryl Does it surprise you as much as it does me that people today seem to think they invented sex and intrique yesterday and it will be the ruination of the world as we know it. Didn't any of those people read books in the past? Lucille I've often wondered what the Victorian "pulp fiction" was like. Cheryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT- Why I'll have more stitching time in 6 wks | Liz from Humbug | Needlework | 2 | March 9th 07 11:28 AM |
Stitching a whole row at a time | Barbara Thompson | Needlework | 5 | February 18th 06 04:14 AM |
OT Inner peace | David & Barbara Schmidt | Quilting | 17 | August 15th 04 08:27 PM |
Cross-stitching the time away with love | aeromom | Needlework | 0 | October 7th 03 06:51 PM |