If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The HairyFacedOnes 'N Me wrote:
Ha! My insurance company is rotten-er than yours! I have 5 large oak trees- 70 to 80 ft. tall that are all 5 dead and very close to my house. I got a bid of $300 to take them down and haul off the wood- I can afford that. My homeowner's insurance company says DO NOT hire that man! He does not have business liability insurance! I can't find anyone else to take the trees out who has insurance- the reason? The insurance premiums are too high for what they can earn taking out dead trees! BUT- my insurance company will wait until the trees fall ON my house, pay thousands to repair the damage to my house and hire these SAME uninsured guys to take the downed trees *off* my house!!! Now, how much sense does THAT make??? I'd think they'd jump for joy that I'd be willing to pay the $300 and have the trees taken care of at this point and save them tens of thousands in repairs at some future date, but nooooOOOOOooooo..... Leslie, The Frustrated and hoping the trees don't fall on her bedroom in the middle of the night!!! The HairyFacedOnes 'N Me- My dogs aren't my whole life... they make my life whole. RCTQ- Houston 2004..... A good friend will come and bail you out of jail.... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn... that was fun!" That is truly insane in some respects, BUT... If the people without the insurance did take the trees out and one fell on the house, you would NOT be covered. Once the tree has fallen there by accident, unhelped by human hand, you ARE covered for repair, but they no longer have to worry about damage to the house, so the cheapest firm who will get rid of it for you is their best option! The argument behind this is that if you go ahead and get the chap to remove the trees, and the house is damaged, you COULD sue the tree remover for the wherewithal to fix the house and cover you accommodation while it's fixed, plus all your belongings that are lost or damaged as a result of the tree falling. However, this would in all probability bankrupt the tree man, and you'd end up with nothing anyway. HOWEVER, the insurance company should be able to find someone to remove the trees to protect the property and ensure your safety, as this would be cheaper than paying out on a claim! Good luck! -- Kate XXXXXX Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
If the people without the insurance did take the trees out and one
fell on the house, you would NOT be covered. The guy who removes the trees takes them down in small chunks with a "cherry picker" type truck, so even if a chunk went wild, they really couldn't do *too* much damage to the house- not like the whole 80 ft. tall tree could! Also the trees range about 15 to 40 ft. from the house, so a chunk would REALLY have to travel, where the whole tree could reach the distance easily. Leslie The HairyFacedOnes 'N Me- My dogs aren't my whole life... they make my life whole. RCTQ- Houston 2004..... A good friend will come and bail you out of jail.... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn... that was fun!" |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I think the biggest concern is the workers getting
hurt. Lawsuits are huge for that kind of thing. Taria That is truly insane in some respects, BUT... If the people without the insurance did take the trees out and one fell on the house, you would NOT be covered. Once the tree has fallen there by accident, unhelped by human hand, you ARE covered for repair, but they no longer have to worry about damage to the house, so the cheapest firm who will get rid of it for you is their best option! The argument behind this is that if you go ahead and get the chap to remove the trees, and the house is damaged, you COULD sue the tree remover for the wherewithal to fix the house and cover you accommodation while it's fixed, plus all your belongings that are lost or damaged as a result of the tree falling. However, this would in all probability bankrupt the tree man, and you'd end up with nothing anyway. HOWEVER, the insurance company should be able to find someone to remove the trees to protect the property and ensure your safety, as this would be cheaper than paying out on a claim! Good luck! -- Kate XXXXXX Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! -- Please visit my web page at: http://home1.gte.net/res0yk6g/taria/index.htm See my Siberian Cat, Lilly, at: http://home1.gte.net/res0yk6g/lillypage/lillycat.htm |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what's the deal with home insurance???/ | Zander | Pottery | 6 | June 2nd 13 09:09 PM |
Insurance and Cheap docs | rainbow | Beads | 2 | February 6th 04 08:46 PM |
insurance for consignment | Joe | General Crafting | 0 | January 3rd 04 04:42 AM |