If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Very true. Not to mention a tornado passing through a trailer park has
a high probability of being observed whereas a tornado passing through miles of fields may not be visually spotted. It irks me to hear about how residents of a trailer park are supposed to go to the park's community/rec center when a storm warning is issued. So many severe storms pass through at night or on weekends and residents show up only to find the doors locked. Not to mention waiting until the warning is announced could easily be too late! On this note, hope anyone who has been in the areas hit this week (tornadoes in/near Cedar Rapids and in Youngstown, probably more I haven't heard about) are ok. The flooding here has been terrible and it is storming again today. One part of the county got three inches in about ninety minutes today on top of the seven inches received over the last two days. The rain has slowed to about one inch per hour now. Several places in NE Ohio have been evacuated and roads are closed all over the place and some bridges are out. All of the yards (except our own as we are elevated) that we can see from our deck have water standing in them. Our basement is dry so far but I know other parts of town which are closer to the Cuyahoga are having a really bad time. The school a couple of blocks away from our house was hit by lightning yesterday and lost their sound and timekeeping systems. Hollis wrote: Just a note here, from a "weather-interested" person (ie SkyWarn weather spotter for the National Weather Service). Tornados don't target trailer parks anymore than they target farms. It's just that trailer parks are traditionally located in flat, treeless areas where tornados have a more of a tendancy to stay on the ground. Now, the damage caused by a tornado going through a trailer park is horrific, mostly because most trailers are not built to withstand the wind force (where more foundation-based homes are). -- Brenda Lewis WIP: J. Himsworth "I Shall Not Want" xs J & P Coats "Dancing Snoopy" latchhook |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Wow, Hollis,
Another Skywarn Spotter on the group. Are you a Ham operator as well?? We are having a working session this Saturday for shelter coverage. I have only had to call bad weather in once, but have also reported rainfall when a net has been set up. I know have my own weather station, wireless, and have the software to show the readings on my computer. It was interesting to note the largest gust 24 mpph,. and rainfall at a rate of 8 inches per hour, when ne of our quick and dirty afternoon storms come through. It didn't last more than 10 mins, but we landed up with 1/2 inch of rain. Gillian KC5TEN,,SW# POL 131A "Hollis" wrote in message om... Brenda Lewis wrote: I cringe whenever I hear about someone living in a trailer park. Then again, I grew up in tornado country and they seemed to target trailers where there is little/no protection from the storm. Midwesterners from several states refer to trailer parks as 'tornado magnets' and the damage is usually devastating. Since Nova Scotia isn't a hotbed for tornadic activity, I suppose it isn't such a concern there. Just a note here, from a "weather-interested" person (ie SkyWarn weather spotter for the National Weather Service). Tornados don't target trailer parks anymore than they target farms. It's just that trailer parks are traditionally located in flat, treeless areas where tornados have a more of a tendancy to stay on the ground. Now, the damage caused by a tornado going through a trailer park is horrific, mostly because most trailers are not built to withstand the wind force (where more foundation-based homes are). My husband and I had the misfortune to help clean up a tornado ravaged area here in Minnesota in 1998. Our job was to clean up the field next to the "town trailer park". When assigned, we were told we'd be working in 3 hour shifts. I thought that was much to short a time to do anything productive. In a sense I was right. We didn't get much cleaned up, but our morale was definately at an all time low after 3 hours. Picking insulation out of bushes without an end in sight is very very depressing. --- Holly K. WIPS: Noah's Ark Sampler - Teresa Wentzler / Bald Eagle - Sherrie Stepp-Aweau / Primitive Santa - ?? www.tortpro.net |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
renting was very restrictive in terms of what you want
to do. which is something that varies depending on where you live. I don't know if my current home is considered a single-level townhouse or an apartment, there are 4 units in my buliding, each with their own separate entrances front and back, small yards (not separately fenced) plus a community laundry and storage unit in the back in what would have been the second bedroom of the sole 1-bed unit in the building. I can plant along the edge of the building in back if I put up a low fenced border, but I choose not to. I can have outdoor furniture, yard toys for the kids, BBQ grill, bicycles, etc. on my patio, but the landlord would prefer that I not put things permanently on the grass (which makes sense, he doesn't want us to kill the grass and he wants to be able to easily mow). There is a fence along the back side of the property, I do have a bird feeder and outdoor thermometer mounted on the fence. I've never talked to him about painting, although my sister wants to redo my living room for sure. I can't have a dog at all, but cats and caged animals are all acceptable with no extra fees. Just my current situation! Jenn L. View My Webshots: http://community.webshots.com/user/jaliace Current projects: Chicago Skyline (The Needlecraftsman) Lady of the Flag (Mirabilia) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Crossing my fingers for all of you. What you relate can be so
devastating to so many people. Many never recover. Dianne Brenda Lewis wrote: Very true. Not to mention a tornado passing through a trailer park has a high probability of being observed whereas a tornado passing through miles of fields may not be visually spotted. It irks me to hear about how residents of a trailer park are supposed to go to the park's community/rec center when a storm warning is issued. So many severe storms pass through at night or on weekends and residents show up only to find the doors locked. Not to mention waiting until the warning is announced could easily be too late! On this note, hope anyone who has been in the areas hit this week (tornadoes in/near Cedar Rapids and in Youngstown, probably more I haven't heard about) are ok. The flooding here has been terrible and it is storming again today. One part of the county got three inches in about ninety minutes today on top of the seven inches received over the last two days. The rain has slowed to about one inch per hour now. Several places in NE Ohio have been evacuated and roads are closed all over the place and some bridges are out. All of the yards (except our own as we are elevated) that we can see from our deck have water standing in them. Our basement is dry so far but I know other parts of town which are closer to the Cuyahoga are having a really bad time. The school a couple of blocks away from our house was hit by lightning yesterday and lost their sound and timekeeping systems. Hollis wrote: Just a note here, from a "weather-interested" person (ie SkyWarn weather spotter for the National Weather Service). Tornados don't target trailer parks anymore than they target farms. It's just that trailer parks are traditionally located in flat, treeless areas where tornados have a more of a tendancy to stay on the ground. Now, the damage caused by a tornado going through a trailer park is horrific, mostly because most trailers are not built to withstand the wind force (where more foundation-based homes are). |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Dianne Lewandowski wrote:
Dr. Brat wrote: We pay a mortgage on which we paid (until recently) 7.9% interest. We got a tax break on that interest, so the real cost was less. And we have some savings, on which we make 2% interest. So the cost of my morgage interest was somewhere around 9% (what I was paying plus what I lost). BUT, I invested $17,000 in this house as a down payment and over 4 years the house has increased in value by $110,000, which is a significant return on my investment, and far more than that money would make me in the bank. And even if you want to argue that it is unrealized because I haven't sold, I can tell you that I've done it before. I invested $7000 in a house in Indiana which I sold for $20,000 more than the purchase price (doubling my money in 7 years) and $9,000 on a house in Ohio which I sold for $11,000 more than the purchase price. Ok, not as good, but I took $20,000 from the sale because I got back the principal that I had paid into it. Ok. I'll let you correct me. But in my head (and I KNOW I have fuzzy math logic), the missing equation here is: I wasn't meaning to correct you, just to add a different perspective. Even though your house increased in value, so did identical houses. So you didn't win. In fact, to upgrade (which used to be why one bought/sold through the years), would cost you more. Yes, but as long as I'm willing to leverage what I have, I can afford to upgrade. And why shouldn't it cost me more to upgrade? It makes no sense to me that it wouldn't. You can win this game if you move to a part of the country where housing is less cost than your current location. Or, you can lose lots if you move where housing is much higher than your present home. I did that when I moved from Ohio to Massachusetts. We sold for $81,000 and bought for $175,000. It was pretty shocking. But the fact is, it has cost me more per month, but it hasn't cost me more on the original investment. In other words, my father lent me $7000 for my first house. When I sold it, I paid him back and had enough to get into the second house. When I sold the second house, I had enough for the down payment on the third house. You could argue that it's costing me more per month, but my mortgage payment has consistently been less than local rent and I'm locked out of the rental market anyway (2 dogs and a cat'll do that). I went round and round some years ago with a guy with a PhD in finance. Talk about having my brain fry in 10 seconds. grin But he agreed with me. The ONLY way to win financially [home ownership] over the long haul is to stay put and pay off the mortgage as quickly as possible. One extra mortgage payment a year can cut as much as 7 years off the life of a mortgage. No, it's not the only way. You can use your mortgage to finance other investments and win that way. Paying off the mortgage is *not* the only smart option. In our case, $9,000 (5% down with a blended mortgage to avoid PMI) got us into a two family that needed work. We dragged our feet more than was smart on the work, but now that the apartment is ready, we will make almost as much in rent every month as our mortgage costs us. AND we'll have enough equity because of the increase in value that we could take some out and use it as the down payment on another rental property if we were so inclined (we're not). I call that winning. We're sitting in a situation (not uncommon these days) wherein we put $45K in the house and by the time the realtors get through and the "negotiations" get through, we'll lose about $15K. Yes, we'll have cash in our pocket, but we'll lose. The market just hasn't kept up, and we haven't been able to live here long enough to appreciate any inflation. But the fact remains that if you had the option of staying longer, you might see a return on your $45K. It's unfortunate that the timing has worked out the way it has, but that doesn't mean it's always a losing situtation. Real estate is like any other investment. There are losers and winners and the winnings are all the bigger where the risk is greater. I'm grateful to have so far come out ahead, but I realize that I could lose. What I'm disagreeing with is the idea that one can *only* lose. Elizabeth -- *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~living well is the best revenge~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* The most important thing one woman can do for another is to illuminate and expand her sense of actual possibilities. --Adrienne Rich *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*barnacle-encrusted bitch~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Margaret StJohn" wrote in message
... Hi Stitch Lady, I was wondering where you are? My husband I are thinking of moving, and it sounds like you live in a reasonable area. 5 years ago it cost more to rent here than buy. Our mortgage was 1000 and the rent was 1200. Now that we are in a recession that has changed. The rent would be 900 today, which still is very little savings over the mortgage. Your method of saving sounds great, except everything is so expensive here it wouldn't work, so we'd like to move where it would. I live in the cheapest rented accommodation possible which is public housing. Well, now I am going to get it in the neck from people who think living in them ain't no good, but I remind them that I have nothing but praise for trailer parks so they don't need to start about public housing. I can email you in confidence with more details if that is okay. I don't want to discuss financial information in such a detail online. Hence why I never included currency in my post and broadly generalised. Stitch Lady --- This email has been certified to be free from viruses. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/2003 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Feel free to email me.
-Margaret Stitch Lady ) wrote: : "Margaret StJohn" wrote in message : ... : Hi Stitch Lady, : I was wondering where you are? My husband I are thinking of moving, : and it sounds like you live in a reasonable area. 5 years ago it cost : more to rent here than buy. Our mortgage was 1000 and the rent was 1200. : Now : that we are in a recession that has changed. The rent would be 900 : today, which still is very little savings over the mortgage. Your : method of saving sounds great, except everything is so expensive here : it wouldn't work, so we'd like to move where it would. : I live in the cheapest rented accommodation possible which is public : housing. Well, now I am going to get it in the neck from people who think : living in them ain't no good, but I remind them that I have nothing but : praise for trailer parks so they don't need to start about public housing. : I can email you in confidence with more details if that is okay. I don't : want to discuss financial information in such a detail online. Hence why I : never included currency in my post and broadly generalised. : Stitch Lady : --- : This email has been certified to be free from viruses. : Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). : Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/2003 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\ o o |\/ o\ o o Margaret St. John |/\ / Let it snow!! http://www.oswego.edu/~es_ind04 /// "There is such a thing as a stupid question. Its the one that is never asked." - MMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Stitch Lady wrote:
[saving while renting vs paying a mortgage] And all costs of saving are calculated and listed with comparative expenses if we were doing things in at 3-4 other ways. Financial planning services are a great help as well... Hope this answers your question. Sure, but I still maintain that success is predicated on your being able to rent for significantly less than you would pay on a mortgage every month. In the area in which I live, that just isn't possible. I wish you the best of success with your plans. Elizabeth -- *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~living well is the best revenge~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* The most important thing one woman can do for another is to illuminate and expand her sense of actual possibilities. --Adrienne Rich *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*barnacle-encrusted bitch~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
My new wife was not to happy finding out we live only 6 miles from
Tornado Alley! We had a few come through in their usual location, didn't worry none of us below the alley. Except when my wife realized, she drives right past there on the way to work and works RIGHT THERE. Of course, were NOT ALLOWED to call that area up north Tornado Alley! Might hurt Realty sales in that area. But those of us who live here, know where 90% of the Tornado's are going to travel. Right down Tornado Alley! Our family owned 12 acres under glass for generations, in 71 years we were only hit by hail twice and both times it only damaged one side of the greenhouses. Yet the insurance companies have increased homeowner insurance by 34% across the board in our state, claiming due to excessive hailstorm damage, which some did occur on the Kansas/Missouri border, clear on the other side of the state. Kansas insurance did not go up! Sounds like another insurance scam to gouge the people of Missouri of even yet more money! Who cares? I'm Tennessee bound anyway! TTUL Gary |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Gillian Murray" wrote:
Wow, Hollis, Another Skywarn Spotter on the group. Are you a Ham operator as well?? We are having a working session this Saturday for shelter coverage. I have only had to call bad weather in once, but have also reported rainfall when a net has been set up. I know have my own weather station, wireless, and have the software to show the readings on my computer. It was interesting to note the largest gust 24 mpph,. and rainfall at a rate of 8 inches per hour, when ne of our quick and dirty afternoon storms come through. It didn't last more than 10 mins, but we landed up with 1/2 inch of rain. Gillian Nope. Just a spotter. My hubby got me into it after he became a ham (KC0FXY), but I utterly refuse to get involved with the radio side. The minute I do he's going to be filling my work area and vehicle with radios and antennas and other sundry equipment! My real reason for becoming a spotter was that I was terrified of strong storms (having been through a couple tornados when I was a kid). I figured that if I took the class I'd know when the weather was bad and when it was REALLY BAD! Since then (4 years ago) we've made a couple storm chasing runs, gotten some neat pictures, (http://www.geocities.com/maxwell_che...1clouds2sm.jpg) but not made any significant calls. The hubby accuses me of being more into the weather now than most paid weather people. (I can usually predict if a day is going to turn stormy or not from a look at the sky, radar and K-index at 5:30 AM) The hubby, bless his soul, keeps trying to get me to become a ham. I let him do it, it gives him another hobby --- Holly K. WIPS: Noah's Ark Sampler - Teresa Wentzler / Bald Eagle - Sherrie Stepp-Aweau / Primitive Santa - ?? www.tortpro.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AD-Charlotte, NC Sept. 27-28, 2003 National Bead Society - World Bead Day Festival | Phineas T Beadd Director National Bead Society | Glass | 0 | September 26th 03 02:18 PM |
AD-Charlotte, NC Sept. 27-28, 2003 National Bead Society - World Bead Day Festival | Phineas T Beadd Director National Bead Society | Glass | 0 | September 26th 03 02:05 PM |
AD-National Bead Society - World Bead Day Festival Charlotte, NC Sept. 27-28, 2003 | Phineas T Beadd Director National Bead Society | Glass | 0 | September 18th 03 07:46 PM |
AD-National Bead Society - World Bead Day Festival Charlotte, NC Sept. 27-28, 2003 | Phineas T Beadd Director National Bead Society | Beads | 0 | September 18th 03 07:45 PM |
AD-Charlotte, NC Sept. 27-28, 2003 National Bead Society - World Bead Day Festival | Phineas T Beadd Director National Bead Society | Beads | 2 | September 12th 03 01:44 PM |