If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On 12/22/03 8:08 PM,"Rachel Janzen"
posted: Ellice wrote: Ah, when my dad went to work for them - he actually interviewed with "the old man" - they wanted someone to head up a new division, build a new manufacturing plant in Miami - which dad did. I used to go work on the line - clipping transisters - on my days off from school - when I was in about 7th, 8th grade. That, and he liked for me to hear what was going on - as my Spanish was much better than his - and there were a lot of Spanish speakers working in the plant. That said - I give him credit - he had many women as supervisors - unusual in those days. Ellice Electronic manufacturing tends to be a female dominated field, at least where I'm from. Our small muscle dexterity skills stands us in good stead. In the electronic manufacturing firm I work for 5 out of 6 of the manufacturing managers are women. And there's a young woman working there now that if she stays with the company, has my bet for running the place in the next 15 years or so. True - the fine hand dexterity. And it seems that the women can sit still for longer periods of time, with paying attention. I somehow remember some things about this from the science POV when taking Manufacturing engineering classes, and Ergonomics. Good for her - working her way up. I always like being in the plants - even in my own career - but I'm more likely to be doing heavy steel or some fancy fabrication stuff - not fine electronics. Just that when my dad made all these women supervisors - it was 40 years ago - and that was bucking tradition. Many plants had women working, but the line supervisors were men. My dad had been a plant manager (he was an electronics engineer), and I guess did well with the people that worked with him - as he moved up the ladder he always tried to be fair. My favorite plant - the place he worked before going to Fischer (it was a communications electronics place, and also did injection molding plastics) - the plant was so big that he and some of the others had scooters to dash around, and some bicycles. The plastics side - those machines are big, and very high roofed - very scary. Ellice |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On 12/22/03 10:00 PM,"animaux" posted:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 01:08:44 GMT, Rachel Janzen opined: Electronic manufacturing tends to be a female dominated field, at least where I'm from. Our small muscle dexterity skills stands us in good stead. In the electronic manufacturing firm I work for 5 out of 6 of the manufacturing managers are women. And there's a young woman working there now that if she stays with the company, has my bet for running the place in the next 15 years or so. Rachel I believe that started back during the war days when women had to manufacture the military equipment while the men went to war. Actually, women have been a vital part of the industrial revolution since the 19th century. But, the growth of the electronics industry timewise coincides with the mid-20th century, ergo - war times. And women indeed worked in manufacturing - all across the board. However, in the electronics industry - doing fine work - they continued working - where in more of the "heavier" jobs the men came back and filled those again - with the women shifting to work elsewhere. For years before I became a grower in the horticulture industry, I was a weapon spec solderer. I built high temp pressure equipment for instrument panels in Boeing jets. I did that for many years and love it. I would do it again need be. It never got tedious to me. I made a great deal of money doing it. Way back 20 years ago I made 18 dollars an hour. I also did quite a bit of mil spec 454, as well. Those terms mean different inspection criteria. Any materiel (correct spelling) built for the military had different standards than commericial applications (Mil Specifications a.k.a. Mil Specs). Has a lot to do with environment of use, frequency of repair that can be handled, or even the acceptable risk of repair, and the locale of the repair. It's always interesting when a company that doesn't normally do mil spec work gets a contract - and then they have to deal with the QA and certs. My contracts guy convinced me to have some specialty steel work done as a Small Business Set Aside - fine. We could only find 2 companies in the US that were seemingly qualified to do it, one was in Seattle and did work for some airplane companies. We had an interesting time - they had to get me welder certs, and the like. When I made my first visit out there to check out the facility, work on some project details I fortunately took with me one of my support contractors from Boston - he and I had designed these things that were to be built (essentially, kind of like vertical airplane wings, with knife edges, made of steel - to hold instrumentation in a vertical array in a very bad environment). We saw the plant, the folks were very nice - and then as I'm starting to get a bit nervous - in the back on one of the grinders is a guy doing metal work - no goggles. Not good - to say the least. Then we come back to the front room and they're showing me the huge roller table and cutting machine - and how they're going to handle the very large, heavy sheets of metal. They now bring out a couple of forklifts, and start to do a kind of duet with them - my 1st problem being that "pops" - the nice, elderly, father of the owner - is one of the guys doing this - wearing his little canvas/rope slip-ons - no safety stuff, and I'm pretty sure, well, quite sure - this is way beyond the lifting limits of the forklifts being used, and the whole way this is going isn't good. Well, as there is one slip, then they're all -"no problem - we can do this -and it continues" - I actually walked out of the plant. I called my contractor friend to come out - he was just kind of shaking his head - told him to go tell them to stop - because they were so far out of any OSHA, or safety compliance I could not even be in there. He went in and spoke with them. We made arrangements, had a good meeting the next day. It's hard - they're nice folks, want to be happy, do a good job - but it hadn't dawned on them at all that some of their casualness was totally unacceptable. Plus, they had to get more precise in what they were going to do. Eventually, they did make the items, and they were great. But what an experience. It was the only time I've ever actually walked out - I had told them to stop - but just being in there while they did such unsafe things - horrid. And it's not that I'm a very prissy person - far from it. Well, back to wrapping stuff! ellice Victoria |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On 12/23/03 9:30 AM,"Cheryl Isaak" posted:
On 12/23/03 9:00 AM, in article , "animaux" wrote: At the Weapon Spec level, the military is right there in the offices and they do the inspection under a microscope. These solder joints I speak of must be perfect. Any pit or abrasion could lead to equipment failure. Many times I'd solder with silver. That was very hard. Not much alloy. QC inspectors must be very alert. They are not an easy bunch to find. You There's actually an agency which monitors contracts for all the DOD. They generally are the folks who have on-site inspectors. In special cases (like me) - we would only allow them to inspect very basic stuff. Usually for my projects we reserved final inspection for my QA guy, and myself. When I had a couple of years of prototypes being made in Northern Mass, especially when critical putting together stages were happening, I and my QA guy were in the plant - 5 days. Some weeks maybe he'd schedule to come up for 2 days, then the next week the entire time. While for the most part the on-site guys are great - when you're doing anything unique - you want trained eyes. And unfortunately, since the on-site guys, are indeed on-site- it's easy for them to fall into a bit too much comfort with the plant - or for the plant guys to bamboozle them at times. It's very hard to find good QA people. It got to be kind of a popular thing for Industrial Engineers in the 80s, but who knows. know that, I know that. Have you ever opened a commercially soldered piece of electronics at home? I had a cow. Big globs, air holes, pin holes, corrosion. That's acceptable in commercial soldering. Things like that are built to break. Although in the last 10 years a lot more commercial soldering is done with newer techniques, and with robots - which eventually brings cost down. Like I said - I'd have committed mayhem! We were subject to snap inspections and tear downs (I did missile work). And the military wandering in just to look around every few months. I would get so mad, these women and men making more an hour than I did and they just didn't give a rat's a**. The next level would catch it (my test line). The amount of $$$ that could have been saved would give you nightmares. I believe the protection given to these people by their union (no disciplinary action, no warning in files) ultimately cost hundreds of people their jobs. Why pay union wages in MA when you can move to Southwest and pay nonunion wages and get a better result. I spoke to an old friend who moved with the production line; that kind of failure dropped by 80%. I know your pain. When the company building for us moved from their old plant (in an old mill building) in Lawrence to the nice new facility in Amesbury - it drove the guys on the floor nuts. They couldn't hide stuff anymore - had to be "cleaner" . We had our really heavy steel work done by a big company in Salt Lake City (I'm talking about 800 tons of moving parts for one thing, and several 6' Diameter, 150'-200' specialty tubes - made of steel normally used in submarines.) They were very good to work with, but we had to get a lot in order for the weld inspections, who was allowed to weld on these parts, etc. My favorite time was one of the nice older guys going over some joints with me in the first 3' length done - I picked up some little thing - we looked at the scans, got it fixed. One of the physicists with me - very neurotic, but smart - was going nuts - because he didn't understand what we were doing in the midst of all these tons of steel, and what did the ultra-sonic tests really mean - how did they work. I hated having to be the one to go in there to do pop inspections - beyond the on-site guy (let's say I don't practice doing welding inspections very frequently). But they were good about it. The most fun - we had to find a way to check straightness inside the tubes - over the internal weld, as a very large, pricey hydraulic plug would be moving in them in their final configuration. We built a sled with a disk of the plug size, and I had to get in the tube, with the couple of plant guys, and we pushed it the whole length (had to take pix and measurements - mark any problems for grinding). That was fun - running down a 200+' long tube of steel. The hardest part - getting into the tube - sliding down thru the nozzle! With the steel guys in Seattle, I let the local QA/govt area guy do regular progress checks, then we flew someone in for critical inspections. You just do what you have to do. ellice |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On 12/23/03 11:51 AM,"animaux" posted:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:32:11 -0500, Ellice opined: There's actually an agency which monitors contracts for all the DOD. They generally are the folks who have on-site inspectors. (...) Yes, where I worked they had a regular office. D-CAS, I believe they were called. Boy, we are a tough bunch of broads! I wish we could have worked together. I love competence. Not much of that around these days. Yup - well, it depends on what years - at one time DCASMA, then something else. But, that's them. Some places they're on site full time - big companies. Others are covered by an area office which for smaller jobs, companies - come to the plant as needed. I was lucky - my lab had a QA/ILS group. After the firing from my project the first QA guy - okay, but he had a little alcohol problem, and he got quite belligerent with the contractors - as opposed to being part of the team. A problem in that being drunk in public kind of undermined his credibility. But the next guy was awesome - he'd just retired out of the army on a medical (very severe diabetes), and we were of similar age. Only thing - I was warned by his boss to be sure we always had fruit, etc with us - as he was wont to work thru when he needed to take a shot. Only a couple of times did we have the "oh, crap - he's talking nonsense - get him some juice - here eat an apple" event. The plant guys were great about it - he and I had our own little cubicles in the front, and just did what we needed. The wonders of matrix management - I had a great team on this long-term project. Was able to weed out the couple of incompetents, or nut-cases - and the rest of us really worked hard. At one point - when the contractor had effed up some bonding - with dire consequences in a field test - the next prototypes -we took over a huge room, made it a clean room - brought in these large pieces of equipment - and did the specialty bonding ourselves. Had my materials guy come up, we brought our 2 high-school interns, our QA guy, and took 2 plant labor guys. Also used their project engineer, and my counterpart dropping in (chief engineer). The Materials guy took video during this week-long operation (we were doing aircraft type bonding) - the video is riotous - I'm clambering around on top - about 15' in the air, or leaning over upside down to either paint goo, or putting in the special huge rivet/bolt things. What fun. The kids had a blast - and it all worked. We'd have had fun. I'm a big fan of competence - but with age have learned to be more patient, and help people to achieve it. Makes for happier teams - getting people to work to their strengths. You don't want to know about my conversation with the former VP of this company - let's just say when he tried giving my guff -early on - we had one of those talks which ended with my explaining what would be decorating the walls of my office - if he ever tried it again! My boss was hysterical when I told him. But the Chief engineer, and the project guys - they liked it - the VP was kind of a macho jerk - smart enough - but just not in tune with doing it right - wanting to cut corners. Didn't appreciate the higher requirements of our specific program. Oh, well - I'm still wrapping stuff - back to the other room! ellice |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|