If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
To Call or Not to Call
Yesterday we all learned that District Judge Lee R. West, of Oklahoma,
had ruled the DO NOT CALL list was illegal. Bummer! I thought to myself that perhaps I would just call Judge West every time I received an unwanted call. Then I thought maybe all of us should do just that. Yesterday evening on the national news they were reporting how Congress is trying to do something about this. One of the Congressman said "Don't call us, call the Judge. His name is Lee R. West" and he held up a sheet of paper with the judge's name and phone number on it. Of course you couldn't see the name and number but I understand that it has been posted on the Internet by some very angry Americans. Over fifty million Americans signed up for this list - that should tell someone something. Now, what should we do? Call the judge? Susie Jordan |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Listening to NPR today, there's buzz about this. One congressman said
lawyers are already workin' on this, and it will get fixed. Congress has your message . . . anytime 50,000,000 people get together to agree on something, they get it. grin The Congressman you saw on the news was just doing the usual "buck passing". The judge is doing what he think is legally the right thing to do, and there may be a point (Congress made the wrong agency in charge of this: FCC rather than FTC . . . or so the judge "thinks"). I would write BOTH snail mail and email to your Senators and Congressman just to make sure they STILL know you DO NOT want marketers calling you. And you might mention, while you're at it, to add in EVERYBODY, since now political organizations, charities, insurance, and others are loopholed out of the law. What's fair for one is fair for the rest. We should ALL be able to opt IN whenever we want. So, if I want my government to put me on their call list, I'll let them know. grin Dianne Susie Jordan wrote: Yesterday we all learned that District Judge Lee R. West, of Oklahoma, had ruled the DO NOT CALL list was illegal. Bummer! I thought to myself that perhaps I would just call Judge West every time I received an unwanted call. Then I thought maybe all of us should do just that. Yesterday evening on the national news they were reporting how Congress is trying to do something about this. One of the Congressman said "Don't call us, call the Judge. His name is Lee R. West" and he held up a sheet of paper with the judge's name and phone number on it. Of course you couldn't see the name and number but I understand that it has been posted on the Internet by some very angry Americans. Over fifty million Americans signed up for this list - that should tell someone something. Now, what should we do? Call the judge? Susie Jordan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I read a news article on the Web today saying that both houses of Congress
had voted to five the FTC the authority to do the Do Not Call List and that it was on its way to the President's desk tonight. Here is the article: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/...all/index.html They acted on that FAST and finally did something right! Bonnie "Susie Jordan" wrote in message om... Yesterday we all learned that District Judge Lee R. West, of Oklahoma, had ruled the DO NOT CALL list was illegal. Bummer! I thought to myself that perhaps I would just call Judge West every time I received an unwanted call. Then I thought maybe all of us should do just that. Yesterday evening on the national news they were reporting how Congress is trying to do something about this. One of the Congressman said "Don't call us, call the Judge. His name is Lee R. West" and he held up a sheet of paper with the judge's name and phone number on it. Of course you couldn't see the name and number but I understand that it has been posted on the Internet by some very angry Americans. Over fifty million Americans signed up for this list - that should tell someone something. Now, what should we do? Call the judge? Susie Jordan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
animaux wrote:
I have written, begged, lobbied, begged, written, wrote again. These phone solicitors will always call regardless what the law says. There is always going to be someone ripped off, usually someone elderly who has not grown as the times have grown. I feel awful, but what to do...I guess I'll write again. The creeps. We don't have calls anymore, Victoria, because my husband was religious about following the procedure that he lays out in this website: http://www.mindspring.com/~dave.heisler/tele.html He collected damages several times and we used the money to treat our friends to dinner and to buy stash for him or for me, or just generally to make our lives more pleasant. I almost wish one of them would call again, because I just got the new Nordic Needle catalog (LOL!). Elizabeth -- *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~living well is the best revenge~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* The most important thing one woman can do for another is to illuminate and expand her sense of actual possibilities. --Adrienne Rich *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:14:50 -0500, Dianne Lewandowski
wrote: (Congress made the wrong agency in charge of this: FCC rather than FTC . . . or so the judge "thinks"). Close, according to what I read. The registry was actually authorized in 1991 and was supposed to be under the jurisdiction of the FTC. Either FTC dropped the ball or tried and didn't get response or something. So the FCC jumped on it and got the massive response we've seen in the past three months. (or do I have those backwards now? eeks, brain drain!) If I remember what I read correctly, the lawsuit started as a result of a couple of the telemarketing companies complaining that the registry violated their First Amendment rights. That's why it was in front of West. I'm not sure why he ruled on whether the current agency had the right to manage such a list rather than on the issue of the Constitutional rights. Jenn L. View My Webshots: http://community.webshots.com/user/jaliace Current projects: Chicago Skyline (The Needlecraftsman) Lady of the Flag (Mirabilia) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I live in Tennessee and we've had a no call list in effect for about 3 years
now. I love it. When it first started I was working 7p-7a, 7 days on 7 off. I was not happy to be awakened by a telemarketer, and let's just say, I've been known to growl when awakened. -- Angel My family are the golden threads running through the tapestry of my life. My friends are the silver threads running through the tapestry of my life. The gold and silver in my tapestry show happiness, love, sadness, togetherness. And most important of all love. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
had ruled the DO NOT CALL list was illegal. Bummer! I thought to
myself that perhaps I would just call Judge West every time I received an unwanted call. Then I thought maybe all of us should do just that. That ruling made me wonder about my right to privacy in my own home. My phone which I pay for is used to disrupt my privacy. Has this idea come up during all of the talk about DO NOT CALL? Just wondering, Boo |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Dianne,
I do agree with you and I was really being a little facetious (maybe a lot.) I probably should have added a "grin" also. Besides, he'd probably sue each and every one of us for harassment. Jenn, you are correct, the original lawsuit was that the law violated the First Amendment right of the telemarketers. A Judge in Denver has struck down the law also, but his reasoning was the violation of the First Amendment. Things are probably moving much too fast and we all need to practice our rights by contacting our representatives. I personally think that they (the companies that use telemarketing) are violating my rights. I know that I can simply not answer the phone, but the ringing itself is intruding on my life. I happen to live in one of the states that has a No Call list that has proven to be constitutionally OK, so I registered with my state list today. I can't remember why I didn't do it to start with. Susie Jordan Dianne Lewandowski wrote in message ... Listening to NPR today, there's buzz about this. One congressman said lawyers are already workin' on this, and it will get fixed. Congress has your message . . . anytime 50,000,000 people get together to agree on something, they get it. grin The Congressman you saw on the news was just doing the usual "buck passing". The judge is doing what he think is legally the right thing to do, and there may be a point (Congress made the wrong agency in charge of this: FCC rather than FTC . . . or so the judge "thinks"). I would write BOTH snail mail and email to your Senators and Congressman just to make sure they STILL know you DO NOT want marketers calling you. And you might mention, while you're at it, to add in EVERYBODY, since now political organizations, charities, insurance, and others are loopholed out of the law. What's fair for one is fair for the rest. We should ALL be able to opt IN whenever we want. So, if I want my government to put me on their call list, I'll let them know. grin Dianne Susie Jordan wrote: Yesterday we all learned that District Judge Lee R. West, of Oklahoma, had ruled the DO NOT CALL list was illegal. Bummer! I thought to myself that perhaps I would just call Judge West every time I received an unwanted call. Then I thought maybe all of us should do just that. Yesterday evening on the national news they were reporting how Congress is trying to do something about this. One of the Congressman said "Don't call us, call the Judge. His name is Lee R. West" and he held up a sheet of paper with the judge's name and phone number on it. Of course you couldn't see the name and number but I understand that it has been posted on the Internet by some very angry Americans. Over fifty million Americans signed up for this list - that should tell someone something. Now, what should we do? Call the judge? Susie Jordan |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
animaux wrote:
[suing telemarketers for violating the FCC do not call rules] I just can't stand the calls that come at night...or I should say "Used to come at night." It's irritating, but not enough for me to go through all the fuss. I do know where you are coming from. I have other things I go to the end of the earth to do, this is not one of them. I hear you, I wouldn't go through it either. He seems to enjoy it, though, and I certainly didn't mind when he was getting checks for $500 and $1500 as settlement or court awarded damages. $1500 for a morning in court is pretty good pay, I would say. But the best part is that they simply don't call us anymore. Elizabeth -- *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~living well is the best revenge~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* The most important thing one woman can do for another is to illuminate and expand her sense of actual possibilities. --Adrienne Rich *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
comm- last call for this great rubber stamp sale | LasImpPan | Rubberstamps | 0 | February 2nd 05 04:17 PM |
Last call! Website submissions! | Valerie | Beads | 5 | September 16th 03 05:14 PM |
2nd try Last Call! Website submission! | Valerie | Beads | 0 | September 15th 03 03:54 PM |