If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
When I went to my grand-daughter's graduation, I noticed that most
of the honour students were female. I posted about it on rctn, and since this have done a bit of enquiring. You may well find your information about females not going into sciences and engineering is out of date. There seem to be major changes going on, *right now* in fields where females are doing better than males. Science and engineering are some of these. I would suggest you get some extremely up-to-date information on this, and it will probably surprise you. I have heard that in some universities, females now are 50% of the freshman engineering students. And the proportion of females to males still seems to be increasing, in engineering and sciences. Beth Katz ) writes: My sisters are both civil engineers. One founded her own traffic engineering company and is doing quite well. The other works in evaluating projects for their environmental consequences. Both are great engineers with a much better fashion and social sense than I have as a computer science professor. While I've known engineers and scientists who fit these jokes wonderfully, I've seen far more engineers and scientists who are fascinating individuals. Yes, they/we look at the world a bit differently, but the world needs a wide variety of people. I'm posting in this thread to remind everyone of the subtle effects of such stereotyping in jokes. There are far too few women going into engineering and the sciences. Girls in middle school and earlier hear these jokes or subtle snippets of them and get discouraged from continuing math and science study. Many pre-teen and teen girls want to be like everyone else or at least not the object of ridicule. The message they get is that being an engineer is nerdy and undesirable. Some of them decide to do it anyway. But others take another path. There have been studies of computer classes in high schools where the guys think they know the material well and the girls think that they don't know it very well at all. But in reality, they know it about equally. So the guys continue on and the girls get discouraged. And our university computer science classes have maybe 3-4 women and 20-some men. The jokes certainly aren't the only problem, but they are a reflection of society's stereotypes. Yes, I forwarded the first set of jokes to my family. But I work against those stereotypes with my kids and other young people. Singing Peggy Seeger's "I'm Gonna be an Engineer": Flying Folk Army's version of the song (3.8MB takes a while to load): http://www.flyingfolk.ca/audio/engineer.mp3 -- Beth Katz -- Jim Cripwell. The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of one's life, any time that is spent in stitching. Adapted from a sign on The Cobb, Lyme Regis, England. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/2/03 11:51 AM,"F.James Cripwell" posted:
When I went to my grand-daughter's graduation, I noticed that most of the honour students were female. I posted about it on rctn, and since this have done a bit of enquiring. You may well find your information about females not going into sciences and engineering is out of date. There seem to be major changes going on, *right now* in fields where females are doing better than males. Science and engineering are some of these. I would suggest you get some extremely up-to-date information on this, and it will probably surprise you. I have heard that in some universities, females now are 50% of the freshman engineering students. And the proportion of females to males still seems to be increasing, in engineering and sciences. Jim, It is you who has incorrect statistics. Engineering has been the strongest hold-out of a large male majority in the profession. In universities and in the working world. While the percentage of females entering the profession has risen markedly in 20 years, it still lags far behind the percentage in such traditional male strongholds as medicine and law. While many of the high school honors students may have been female, this doesn't translate into staying in engineering school. Some will try it, and opt for another area. And the stereotype don't help. In fact, for most women, if they are science orientated - medicine is posed to them as an optimal career choice.Similarly for the skilled in language arts, politics - they look into law school. At present, there are many more female students who will major in some form of engineering, which will lead them to a better job than a business degree. But, they are likely to be in Industrial Engineering, or Management, or even doing an undergrad degree in a core engineering area, but not intending to pursue work in that area. When I was in grad school, and doing research in the mid-80's - the average percentage in an engineering school of female students was about 4%, moving up to about 12% in the nineties. I would be astonished if it were above 20% now. At an engineering education conference I recall discussions that it was expected that the enrollment of women would level out at about 12-15%. Something to do with while women are more math oriented at a young age, and many have a better spatial dimension perspective - there are other brain function aspects of engineering which do not suit women. Kind of a difference in the species. FWIW, when I first went to undergrad school, there was a 70:1 ratio of men to females in the school. In grad school, 1985, in my department it was about 20:1 . The undergrads in the engineering college, I'd say about 12:1 . So, now in a class of 35, you're likely to see several female students. Maybe in some classes a 4:1 ratio. But on the whole, it's far less. My engineering professor friends often lament this - and one of my friends - who is a Prof of Systems Engineering (no actual engineering degree, she's a decision theorist & AI specialist) actually advises the Society of Women Engineers - because she wanted to encourage them. But, her dept is very much a Computer Sys dept. Occassionally I & my other professional friends will do a guest talk at a meeting, or lecture at some class. We're always trying to show that we could have nice clothes, good haircuts, not wear pocket pen protectors, have lives, do art , and still be engineers. It has been a source of amazement to my doctor and lawyer friends how still different it is in engineering. But, that's life. Ellice - now off the soapbox to go do some work |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting thoughts on a similar subject were discussed yesterday on
National Public Radio. Had to do with why women don't succeed in the corporate world. Appropro to this discussion because it had to do with: Do we change the university culture to train women to be more like men or train men to be more like women. [I'm paraphrasing here, this was the gist] I only caught about 15 minutes of this delightful call-in/interview, so I didn't get all the details. But finally, one woman called in to say [I loved this . . . exactly what I would have said] What we need to do is train people to allow individuals to be themselves and accept them in any role as "themselves". Dianne Meredith wrote: I still have classes that are primarily male. I think that the only girls who stay in the hard sciences and engineering are the ones who are stubborn enough to prove everyone wrong when they say, "You can't do that." I'm at Tufts now, and the engineering school here is one of the few in the country where there are more students majoring in eng. than started as freshmen. Meredith Ellice wrote: On 8/2/03 11:51 AM,"F.James Cripwell" posted: When I went to my grand-daughter's graduation, I noticed that most of the honour students were female. I posted about it on rctn, and since this have done a bit of enquiring. You may well find your information about females not going into sciences and engineering is out of date. There seem to be major changes going on, *right now* in fields where females are doing better than males. Science and engineering are some of these. I would suggest you get some extremely up-to-date information on this, and it will probably surprise you. I have heard that in some universities, females now are 50% of the freshman engineering students. And the proportion of females to males still seems to be increasing, in engineering and sciences. Jim, It is you who has incorrect statistics. Engineering has been the strongest hold-out of a large male majority in the profession. In universities and in the working world. While the percentage of females entering the profession has risen markedly in 20 years, it still lags far behind the percentage in such traditional male strongholds as medicine and law. While many of the high school honors students may have been female, this doesn't translate into staying in engineering school. Some will try it, and opt for another area. And the stereotype don't help. In fact, for most women, if they are science orientated - medicine is posed to them as an optimal career choice.Similarly for the skilled in language arts, politics - they look into law school. At present, there are many more female students who will major in some form of engineering, which will lead them to a better job than a business degree. But, they are likely to be in Industrial Engineering, or Management, or even doing an undergrad degree in a core engineering area, but not intending to pursue work in that area. When I was in grad school, and doing research in the mid-80's - the average percentage in an engineering school of female students was about 4%, moving up to about 12% in the nineties. I would be astonished if it were above 20% now. At an engineering education conference I recall discussions that it was expected that the enrollment of women would level out at about 12-15%. Something to do with while women are more math oriented at a young age, and many have a better spatial dimension perspective - there are other brain function aspects of engineering which do not suit women. Kind of a difference in the species. FWIW, when I first went to undergrad school, there was a 70:1 ratio of men to females in the school. In grad school, 1985, in my department it was about 20:1 . The undergrads in the engineering college, I'd say about 12:1 . So, now in a class of 35, you're likely to see several female students. Maybe in some classes a 4:1 ratio. But on the whole, it's far less. My engineering professor friends often lament this - and one of my friends - who is a Prof of Systems Engineering (no actual engineering degree, she's a decision theorist & AI specialist) actually advises the Society of Women Engineers - because she wanted to encourage them. But, her dept is very much a Computer Sys dept. Occassionally I & my other professional friends will do a guest talk at a meeting, or lecture at some class. We're always trying to show that we could have nice clothes, good haircuts, not wear pocket pen protectors, have lives, do art , and still be engineers. It has been a source of amazement to my doctor and lawyer friends how still different it is in engineering. But, that's life. Ellice - now off the soapbox to go do some work |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What we need to do is train people to allow individuals to be themselves and accept them in any role as "themselves". This reminds me of an Ali McBeal segment that delt with a woman who was not made partner (or was fired) in a law firm because she refused to work overtime because she had a child she wanted to spend time with. After the owner of the firm admitted he hardly knew his children because of his working long hours, the argument was made that no one, male or female, should be expected to work the hours men have traditionally accepted as necessary to advance in the workplace. Realistically "the rules" are made by men and when change is attempted by women, they are characterized as weak and/or man haters and/or worse. Change will come slowly and I hope some day everyone will have more respect for family/humanity and that the workplace will actually reflect the values we, as a nation, say we embrace. Jane |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Just coincidentally, this week I have been working on a project from a college
which is best left unnamed because of this sorry statistic provided by one of their deans. Only 19% of incoming students can pass the Basic Math test without remedial classes. (Sorry, he didn't break it out by gender.) The good news is that this college has gotten some inspiring math teachers, so most students do pass the test after the remedial class, but that doesn't solve the underlying problem that 80% of students are graduating high school without even Basic Math skills. If you can't pass Basic Math, then you can't do the algebra, geometry and trigonometry required to pass Engineering classes. Unless you're unusually determined to be an engineer, you'll probably pick a different major when you discover that problem. One of my friends, an otherwise bright girl, had some difficulty with Math, but didn't work at overcoming it. Her other grades were good enough to please her parents, who didn't think it was all that important for a girl to have more than rudimentary math skills. Then her older brother got to high school and reported that all students had to pass Ninth Grade Math to graduate. She applied herself merely enough to pass, because by then she had convinced herself that she'd never do well at math because she was a girl. (Meanwhile, she's watching me collect every math award available, and one of our teachers get a Ph.D. in math, which should have given her a suspicion that gender has nothing to do with math skills.) Unfortunately, she's not alone. As an adult, I got to know another woman, whose father was an engineer, who was also allowed to slack off in that subject because girls didn't need to know much math. If it's no big deal to an engineer that his daughter is failing math, then who *is* going to impress on girls that this is an important subject? -- Finished 7/4/03 -- Army Wife WIP: Angel of Autumn, Calif Sampler, Holiday Snowglobe, Guide the Hands (2d one) Paralegal - Writer - Editor - Researcher http://hometown.aol.com/kmc528/KMC.html |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
My DH is the head of a structural engineering department at a large
consulting firm (many other depts than structural and he's not in the biggest office). Currently he is over 7 people; 3 of them are female. His very best EVER draftsperson is retiring soon and she is a 72 yo female. She is a whiz with the Autocad and other computer drafting programs and he is wondering if one person will be enough to replace her. So at his workplace, at least, the ratio is not terribly lopsided. Just .02. Paula B. Ellice wrote in message ... On 8/2/03 11:51 AM,"F.James Cripwell" posted: When I went to my grand-daughter's graduation, I noticed that most of the honour students were female. I posted about it on rctn, and since this have done a bit of enquiring. You may well find your information about females not going into sciences and engineering is out of date. There seem to be major changes going on, *right now* in fields where females are doing better than males. Science and engineering are some of these. I would suggest you get some extremely up-to-date information on this, and it will probably surprise you. I have heard that in some universities, females now are 50% of the freshman engineering students. And the proportion of females to males still seems to be increasing, in engineering and sciences. Jim, It is you who has incorrect statistics. Engineering has been the strongest hold-out of a large male majority in the profession. In universities and in the working world. While the percentage of females entering the profession has risen markedly in 20 years, it still lags far behind the percentage in such traditional male strongholds as medicine and law. While many of the high school honors students may have been female, this doesn't translate into staying in engineering school. Some will try it, and opt for another area. And the stereotype don't help. In fact, for most women, if they are science orientated - medicine is posed to them as an optimal career choice.Similarly for the skilled in language arts, politics - they look into law school. At present, there are many more female students who will major in some form of engineering, which will lead them to a better job than a business degree. But, they are likely to be in Industrial Engineering, or Management, or even doing an undergrad degree in a core engineering area, but not intending to pursue work in that area. When I was in grad school, and doing research in the mid-80's - the average percentage in an engineering school of female students was about 4%, moving up to about 12% in the nineties. I would be astonished if it were above 20% now. At an engineering education conference I recall discussions that it was expected that the enrollment of women would level out at about 12-15%. Something to do with while women are more math oriented at a young age, and many have a better spatial dimension perspective - there are other brain function aspects of engineering which do not suit women. Kind of a difference in the species. FWIW, when I first went to undergrad school, there was a 70:1 ratio of men to females in the school. In grad school, 1985, in my department it was about 20:1 . The undergrads in the engineering college, I'd say about 12:1 . So, now in a class of 35, you're likely to see several female students. Maybe in some classes a 4:1 ratio. But on the whole, it's far less. My engineering professor friends often lament this - and one of my friends - who is a Prof of Systems Engineering (no actual engineering degree, she's a decision theorist & AI specialist) actually advises the Society of Women Engineers - because she wanted to encourage them. But, her dept is very much a Computer Sys dept. Occassionally I & my other professional friends will do a guest talk at a meeting, or lecture at some class. We're always trying to show that we could have nice clothes, good haircuts, not wear pocket pen protectors, have lives, do art , and still be engineers. It has been a source of amazement to my doctor and lawyer friends how still different it is in engineering. But, that's life. Ellice - now off the soapbox to go do some work |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/3/03 9:35 PM,"PaulaB" posted:
My DH is the head of a structural engineering department at a large consulting firm (many other depts than structural and he's not in the biggest office). Currently he is over 7 people; 3 of them are female. His very best EVER draftsperson is retiring soon and she is a 72 yo female. She is a whiz with the Autocad and other computer drafting programs and he is wondering if one person will be enough to replace her. So at his workplace, at least, the ratio is not terribly lopsided. Just .02. Paula B. That's great. But, the draftsperson, who undoubtedly is very good at what she does, isn't an engineer. That said, my dad had a great draftsperson about 50 years ago, that was a woman, with an engineering degree. But his boss wouldn't let him hire her as an engineer, and he always felt bad about that. My observations have been that Electrical and Civil engineering are the disciplines with the highest percentage of women, as compared with the other traditional engineering disciplines. Now, computer engineering is right up there. A lot of very math oriented people go into EE, and I think Civ E really calls to people who want to do field work. There are plenty of companies out there with relatively high female staffs, balanced by many with really low ones. A lot depends on the working attitude as to how people mix. And now, there are tons of women doing computer programming, working in Info Tech - much more so than in the other engineering fields. ellice |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/2/03 3:10 PM,"F.James Cripwell" posted:
From past statistics, you are absolutely correct. But I am talking university enrolment in 2003; i.e. these students have not yet gone to university. I am told that some engineering faculties will have 50% female freshmen *next* year. Last year, I understand, that in all North American universities, there were more first year female medical students than male. This is the first time this has happened. So I am talking "up to the minute" statistics. Not statistics that are more than a year or so old. Do you have figures for next year's students? Ellice wrote: Jim, what you stated, IIRC, is there would be a majority of female students in engineering and that someone who is on faculty in a science dept, teaching and seeing these college students was wrong. You didn't say you were just predicting university enrollment. And you stated this based upon your observation of the majority of honor graduates at a high school graduation, That is what I responded to. And that leap which you made about what degree and career paths those high school graduates would take is still incorrect. Having 50% freshman in universities does not equate to 50% in engineering. Having more than 50% honor graduates as female doesn't mean they're all majoring in the hard sciences, or engineering, or even that they're all going to college. And it is indeed possible that some engineering departments at some schools may indeed have 50% incoming freshmen females. Again, that doesn't equate to there being 50% or more than 50% female engineering students. So, while there has been a trend for 20 years for there to be an increase in the number of female engineering students - it is still far below 50%. And everything that I've seen in professional journals would indicate that for numerous reasons ranging from sociology to specific brain functions the area of engineering will be one that reaches its natural balance point at more like 4:1 male to female, if not even less. If you want to talk up to the minute statistics, as opposed to discussion from a radio or tv program, then you need some numbers, and assumptions that go with those statistics - as in what's their basis. Is this a survey of 1000, or 100, or 10 high schools? How many universities, or does it include community colleges? What year student population are you considering, or is it graduating classes, or incoming freshmen only. And from experience, as anyone who has been through professional school can tell you, the composition of an incoming class will vary greatly from the graduating class - whether it's engineering, physics, med school, law school, music school, etc. And, when I get the newest report information from the National Academy of Science, and the Professional Engineering organization, and the Society of Women Engineers, and maybe the Accrediting board for Engineering, I'll be happy to forward some hard numbers. Of course, my experience, is only as current as last year - based on doing invited lectures and working on a survey of female engineering professionals, with other female faculty, to be published hopefully in the next year. FWIW, I've worked at three public universities and none would release registration data until at least the tenth day of class. Some will not consider it accurate until the normal withdrawal window has closed. Too many students accept admission to more than one school and wait until the last minute to decide which to attend. Others stick around until the first round of exams and decide it is too hard or they are homesick. Any data released now is probably PR hype which is not an official report from the Registrar. I would not consider it reliable. To *really* know how many engineering students are in a particular class, you need to check the retainment data after both year one and year two. This will tell you how many are weeded out or change/leave by choice. If an engineering student can stay on track through the first two years, they are very likely to complete the program. -- Brenda Lewis WIP: J. Himsworth "I Shall Not Want" xs J & P Coats "Dancing Snoopy" latchhook |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Ellice wrote in message ...
On 8/3/03 9:35 PM,"PaulaB" posted: My DH is the head of a structural engineering department at a large consulting firm (many other depts than structural and he's not in the biggest office). Currently he is over 7 people; 3 of them are female. His very best EVER draftsperson is retiring soon and she is a 72 yo female. She is a whiz with the Autocad and other computer drafting programs and he is wondering if one person will be enough to replace her. So at his workplace, at least, the ratio is not terribly lopsided. Just .02. Paula B. That's great. But, the draftsperson, who undoubtedly is very good at what she does, isn't an engineer. That said, my dad had a great draftsperson about 50 years ago, that was a woman, with an engineering degree. But his boss wouldn't let him hire her as an engineer, and he always felt bad about that. Well, I know that! Duh. But I thought it was interesting that Monica is still in her career of choice, which was certainly nearly all male-dominated back when she started. Paula B. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/4/03 4:06 AM,"Brenda Lewis" posted:
To *really* know how many engineering students are in a particular class, you need to check the retainment data after both year one and year two. This will tell you how many are weeded out or change/leave by choice. If an engineering student can stay on track through the first two years, they are very likely to complete the program. You are very right, Brenda. The Society of Women Engineers (SWE) used to do an annual report with statistics on the different engineering fields, #s working in them, how many years - grouped by experience - 1-3, and so forth. Also, the Professional Engineers org does a similar annual report. SWE is more likely to reflect enrollments. And there is info available thru ABET (the engineering accreditation group). Definitely the 2nd year is a good indicator. Most engineering students make the switch out either right away, or at the end of 2nd year. If they've made it thru 2nd year, they're more likely to stay - at least struggling isn't the issue. It's in 3rd year where course work is mostly engineering, and then people either like it, love it or leave. Not worth the agony if you don't really like it ;^) Thanks for chiming in with some good info. ellice |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Waaay OT - engineer humor | Joan Erickson | Needlework | 1 | August 1st 03 05:46 PM |