If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Tom,
Regardless of my opinion on your post, I still want you to know that I think you're cool and your sewing/quilting is fabulous! Larisa Tom Farrell wrote: "Atom1" wrote in message ... Hey Pal, You are not my pal. Like all your ilk, you wish to not be accountable to the rules of the masses. My ilk? Who, precisely, would you characterize as my "ilk"? And precisely what "rules of the masses" are you accusing me of breaking? You posted off topic a very controversial subject that is specifically mentioned to be private. "mentioned to be private"? That makes no sense at all. 9/11 is about the most public topic in the history of mankind. god forbid someone should disagree with your side. Everyone is entirely welcome to disagree with me. And I have every right to disagree with them. Thanks Wanda for speaking up. I think Wanda's post was very illustrative. The only thing that is appropriate here is sewing, anything else is open season. Quite right. I do not agree with you Tom, what you said was (un)veiled solicitationfor votes which sure got me turned in. Why the parentheses around the "un"? I was pretty plain about it. I don't see how your post is any different, you are asking for something. You just said that you don't see how my post is any different from... my post. I don't ask that you be turnedc in by the anal retentive, but rather KEEP IT ON TOPIC unless you WANT us to discuss the speciousness of your argument. Oh, please do. I'd love the opportunity to poke holes in your rebuttals. SHUT UP AND SEW Here in the United States, you have no right to order me to be silent. If you had been a little more polite about it, I might have decided to let your comment stand without reply, but no, you had to choose to use maximum rudeness, so I decided you needed a reply. Michelle Italy Who keeps her vote and thoughts to herself (the reason there are curtains in your voting stations) Yes, they're to allow you to choose to have privacy about your voting choice. There is absolutely no law saying that I can't choose to shout it to the world the moment I walk out the door of my polling place, however, while there are laws saying that I may choose to do so. Tom |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote:
Please vote this year. Please be sure your vote counts. And if you have the time to be able to help, check to see if your precinct needs more election workers. The job probably won't pay much, but it's incredibly important. -- Kathy - Chairman of the election board for my precinct Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval at http://www.gnksa.org/ OE-quotefix can fix OE: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Atom1 wrote:
Who keeps her vote and thoughts to herself (the reason there are curtains in your voting stations) When I voted last week on the new computer voting machine, there were no curtains. There were two wings attached at a 45º angle to the main screen, and the print on the screen was huge. No body would have had any difficulty reading my computer screen from 20 feet away. Also, the machines were set so that the voter faced the wall and the machine screen faced the center of the room. I will admit, it made me a little uneasy. I grew up with the old voting machines that had the handle that closed the curtain and recorded the vote when you opened the curtain. I wonder if I could whip up a portable curtain unit before the general election. -- Joanne @ stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us http://bernardschopen.tripod.com/ Life is about the journey, not about the destination. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
I'm pretty sure that the reason for the openness is so that hackers with
evildoing on their minds don't go into the curtained roomlet, whip out a portable, flexible keyboard, hack into the system, and change millions of votes in one fell swoop. I saw a piece on one of the news shows that illustrated this (or heard it on the radio, can't remember which). The portable keyboard rolls up, tucks inside a sleeve, and makes it ridiculously easy for security to be breached. But it is a shame. I prefer privacy to my vote, as well. Karen in Ohio Pogonip wrote: Atom1 wrote: Who keeps her vote and thoughts to herself (the reason there are curtains in your voting stations) When I voted last week on the new computer voting machine, there were no curtains. There were two wings attached at a 45º angle to the main screen, and the print on the screen was huge. No body would have had any difficulty reading my computer screen from 20 feet away. Also, the machines were set so that the voter faced the wall and the machine screen faced the center of the room. I will admit, it made me a little uneasy. I grew up with the old voting machines that had the handle that closed the curtain and recorded the vote when you opened the curtain. I wonder if I could whip up a portable curtain unit before the general election. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
I like to absentee vote and that way you have privacy and
time. DH got waylaid at work one year and ended up out of town later than the polls were open. He votes absentee too since then. They do get counted here. Taria Karen Maslowski wrote: I'm pretty sure that the reason for the openness is so that hackers with evildoing on their minds don't go into the curtained roomlet, whip out a portable, flexible keyboard, hack into the system, and change millions of votes in one fell swoop. I saw a piece on one of the news shows that illustrated this (or heard it on the radio, can't remember which). The portable keyboard rolls up, tucks inside a sleeve, and makes it ridiculously easy for security to be breached. But it is a shame. I prefer privacy to my vote, as well. Karen in Ohio Pogonip wrote: Atom1 wrote: Who keeps her vote and thoughts to herself (the reason there are curtains in your voting stations) When I voted last week on the new computer voting machine, there were no curtains. There were two wings attached at a 45º angle to the main screen, and the print on the screen was huge. No body would have had any difficulty reading my computer screen from 20 feet away. Also, the machines were set so that the voter faced the wall and the machine screen faced the center of the room. I will admit, it made me a little uneasy. I grew up with the old voting machines that had the handle that closed the curtain and recorded the vote when you opened the curtain. I wonder if I could whip up a portable curtain unit before the general election. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
We have early voting and it is much easier than waiting in line on Election
Day. Usually in and out in less than 5 minutes. Last election was in a school gym and I was the only one aside from the election workers. I'll go early this year too. I do miss the excitement of voting on Election Day, but time is of the essence. Linda |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
teleflora wrote:
It counts, sorta. They count the ballots, then if the absentee ballots might change the outcome of the election they will do it. Saving your tax dollars in action. (rolling eyes) I don't vote absentee any more ever since I found that out. Now, this is in Canada, right? Nope, California. -- Where no oxen are, the crib is clean, But much benefit is derived from the labor of the ox. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
small change wrote:
I don't vote absentee any more ever since I found that out. I'd still rather vote absentee and have my vote exist, than to vote on a computer and have it mysteriously dissapear. We have paper ballots here. -- Where no oxen are, the crib is clean, But much benefit is derived from the labor of the ox. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
teleflora wrote:
Do you have proof of this, or do we just have to believe it because you said so? Certainly there must be something on the web that will support this assertion. Not that I expect this to make one iota of difference to you: You sure don't know me very well. Thank you for the links. They were very interesting. It reminds me of something that happened four years ago when some conservative candidate was at someplace like Harvard campaigning for the primaries and got roundly booed by the liberals, but then after that when a liberal candidate -- I think it was Gore -- was accidentally scheduled to speak at a very conservative place -- maybe a Bible college or something -- where people opposed everything the candidate stood for, they let the candidate come and were very polite to him. I'm not argumentative -- I was just curious. I see both sides accusing the opposition of the same tactics to the point where both sides could not be true. -- Where no oxen are, the crib is clean, But much benefit is derived from the labor of the ox. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
I.E.Z. wrote:
Gladly. I am not a liar. http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?n... 418216&rfi=6 I never said you were a liar. I just wanted to read something from the general press to see the whole picture Melinda, who grew up in Stroudsburg, county seat of Monroe County, and who congratulates you on your choice of newspapers, although the Pocono Record was her choice when she lived back there -- Where no oxen are, the crib is clean, But much benefit is derived from the labor of the ox. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|