If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Featherweight questions
The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has
asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, Polly, you can't drop the feed dogs on the 221 (the real
Featherweight). But your neighbor would never regret buying a FW for piecing. It's the best sewing machine in the world (IMNSHO) for sewing a straight stitch. There are other Singers that do have that feed-dog dropping capability. May I suggest doing a google search at Featherweight Fanatics? There is tons of information available there about FWs and other Singer machines. Here's the link: http://www.featherweightfanatics.com/ Perhaps she might look at an older Kenmore for MQ? My 1977 (approximately) model does have the capability of dropping the feed dogs, zigzag, buttonholes and many other useful features; and in spite of making several quilts and lots of other goodies, it has *never* seen the inside of a repair shop. The under-arm area (ewwww---wish I knew the correct term!) will take a double-bed quilt quite well. I've never made a queen size, though, it might be too small for that. I've read many posts on the FWF newsletter that folks love the Singer 301 for MQ. I've never seen one, but I understand that there is more room on the bed under the arm to maneuver the quilt. Just my two cents on that subject. -- Carolyn in The Old Pueblo take out nospam to reply If it ain't broke, you're not trying. --Red Green If it ain't broke, it ain't mine. --Carolyn McCarty If at first you don't succeed, switch to power tools. --Red Green If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer. --Carolyn McCarty "Polly Esther" wrote in message . net... The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you Carolyn. I cut my teeth on the Singer 301 (probably wherever she
is, she looks like it) and was only going to suggest the Featherweight because the 301 is heavy. I know the 301 will do what she needs; we'll get started hunting. I appreciate your answer. Polly "Carolyn McCarty" wrote in message ... Sorry, Polly, you can't drop the feed dogs on the 221 (the real Featherweight). But your neighbor would never regret buying a FW for piecing. It's the best sewing machine in the world (IMNSHO) for sewing a straight stitch. There are other Singers that do have that feed-dog dropping capability. May I suggest doing a google search at Featherweight Fanatics? There is tons of information available there about FWs and other Singer machines. Here's the link: http://www.featherweightfanatics.com/ Perhaps she might look at an older Kenmore for MQ? My 1977 (approximately) model does have the capability of dropping the feed dogs, zigzag, buttonholes and many other useful features; and in spite of making several quilts and lots of other goodies, it has *never* seen the inside of a repair shop. The under-arm area (ewwww---wish I knew the correct term!) will take a double-bed quilt quite well. I've never made a queen size, though, it might be too small for that. I've read many posts on the FWF newsletter that folks love the Singer 301 for MQ. I've never seen one, but I understand that there is more room on the bed under the arm to maneuver the quilt. Just my two cents on that subject. -- Carolyn in The Old Pueblo take out nospam to reply If it ain't broke, you're not trying. --Red Green If it ain't broke, it ain't mine. --Carolyn McCarty If at first you don't succeed, switch to power tools. --Red Green If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer. --Carolyn McCarty "Polly Esther" wrote in message . net... The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Polly Esther wrote:
The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly There are two versions of the Featherweight: one has a free arm and the other doesn't. You cannot drop the feed dogs. The gap through the middle is small (it's a dinky little machine), and while you can get feed dog cover plates, you will only ever fit a small quilt under it for quilting. Brilliant machine for straight line sewing and piecing, mind. I love mine for both quilty stuff and dressmaking, but for quilting anything bigger than a small lap or baby quilt, choose something bigger. You can see mine in my web site - URL below. -- Kate XXXXXX Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Feed dogs go down on the 222 (the freearm style FW). They are pricey
though. The standard black or even white 221 FW does not have feed dogs that drop. There is a plate for feed dog covering or you can even cover with a piece of cardboard or plastic but I wouldn't recommend a lot of MQ'ing with a FW because of the size. The 301 is wonderful IMO. I would rather piece on a 301 than a FW any day. Dogs on the 301 do drop and the machine is a tad larger so more room to work when quilting. The weight of a FW in its case is about the same as a 301 out of the case and the 301 can just be schlepped around by its handy handle. If you get the cradle you can drop it into any most any SInger cabinet and the set up is wonderful. The 301 prices are pretty good too. Actually a SInger 201 or 15 are great full size machines that are great to quilt on too. Even a 99 makes a very pretty stitch but boy its heavy. There is some info on my old web page that might help : http://home1.gte.net/res6mc9p/taria/index.htm I wonder how many folks get discouraged with sewing because of rotten machines? I was nosing around on EBay the other day. A very nice Bernina 1008 seems to be selling there for $600 or so. That is a wonderful machine that I would imagine anyone could enjoy for years. Glad you are helping your neighbor out Polly. Taria Polly Esther wrote: The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Way too many just give up, I expect, because of SM junk. She asked what I
thought about her buying a new machine at Wally for about $250. I told her "over my dead body". Didn't want to leave any doubt. I didn't know about the 201 and 15; thank you Taria. Polly "taria" wrote I wonder how many folks get discouraged with sewing because of rotten machines? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Featherweights just aren't hunky enough for satisfactory machine quilting of
anything larger than a table mat. It is their only flaw, but of course this is the trade-off for lighter weight. I do love my elderly Singer 216, especially for the huge amount of thread the bobbin will hold. Haven't measured scientifically, but I estimate it is at least half again as much as the Pfaff bobbin. And that machine is the Rock of Gibraltar, sits in its cabinet and doesn't budge. Even my delightful Pfaff will occasionally scoot over the table a little bit when attacked by a heavy quilt! "Polly Esther" wrote in message . net... The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Polly,
The feeddogs do not drop on the 'regular' 221 FW; however they DO drop on the 222K, which is the free-arm version of the FW. On the 221, the feeddogs can be covered. Singer made feeddog covers and there are generic ones available also. If she is not in need of a portable machine, other vintage Singers with droppable feed dogs are the 201 and 15-91 models. Both of these have LARGE areas under the 'harp' for those big projects. -Irene Polly Esther wrote: The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The 301 is just a few lbs heavier than the FW *but* it has a built in
handle so you don't need the case to carry it around in - so the weight probably evens out. -Irene Polly Esther wrote: Thank you Carolyn. I cut my teeth on the Singer 301 (probably wherever she is, she looks like it) and was only going to suggest the Featherweight because the 301 is heavy. I know the 301 will do what she needs; we'll get started hunting. I appreciate your answer. Polly "Carolyn McCarty" wrote in message ... Sorry, Polly, you can't drop the feed dogs on the 221 (the real Featherweight). But your neighbor would never regret buying a FW for piecing. It's the best sewing machine in the world (IMNSHO) for sewing a straight stitch. There are other Singers that do have that feed-dog dropping capability. May I suggest doing a google search at Featherweight Fanatics? There is tons of information available there about FWs and other Singer machines. Here's the link: http://www.featherweightfanatics.com/ Perhaps she might look at an older Kenmore for MQ? My 1977 (approximately) model does have the capability of dropping the feed dogs, zigzag, buttonholes and many other useful features; and in spite of making several quilts and lots of other goodies, it has *never* seen the inside of a repair shop. The under-arm area (ewwww---wish I knew the correct term!) will take a double-bed quilt quite well. I've never made a queen size, though, it might be too small for that. I've read many posts on the FWF newsletter that folks love the Singer 301 for MQ. I've never seen one, but I understand that there is more room on the bed under the arm to maneuver the quilt. Just my two cents on that subject. -- Carolyn in The Old Pueblo take out nospam to reply If it ain't broke, you're not trying. --Red Green If it ain't broke, it ain't mine. --Carolyn McCarty If at first you don't succeed, switch to power tools. --Red Green If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer. --Carolyn McCarty "Polly Esther" wrote in message k.net... The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The 301 is just a few lbs heavier than the FW *but* it has a built in
handle so you don't need the case to carry it around in - so the weight probably evens out. -Irene Polly Esther wrote: Thank you Carolyn. I cut my teeth on the Singer 301 (probably wherever she is, she looks like it) and was only going to suggest the Featherweight because the 301 is heavy. I know the 301 will do what she needs; we'll get started hunting. I appreciate your answer. Polly "Carolyn McCarty" wrote in message ... Sorry, Polly, you can't drop the feed dogs on the 221 (the real Featherweight). But your neighbor would never regret buying a FW for piecing. It's the best sewing machine in the world (IMNSHO) for sewing a straight stitch. There are other Singers that do have that feed-dog dropping capability. May I suggest doing a google search at Featherweight Fanatics? There is tons of information available there about FWs and other Singer machines. Here's the link: http://www.featherweightfanatics.com/ Perhaps she might look at an older Kenmore for MQ? My 1977 (approximately) model does have the capability of dropping the feed dogs, zigzag, buttonholes and many other useful features; and in spite of making several quilts and lots of other goodies, it has *never* seen the inside of a repair shop. The under-arm area (ewwww---wish I knew the correct term!) will take a double-bed quilt quite well. I've never made a queen size, though, it might be too small for that. I've read many posts on the FWF newsletter that folks love the Singer 301 for MQ. I've never seen one, but I understand that there is more room on the bed under the arm to maneuver the quilt. Just my two cents on that subject. -- Carolyn in The Old Pueblo take out nospam to reply If it ain't broke, you're not trying. --Red Green If it ain't broke, it ain't mine. --Carolyn McCarty If at first you don't succeed, switch to power tools. --Red Green If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer. --Carolyn McCarty "Polly Esther" wrote in message k.net... The neighbor that is learning to quilt is sewing on annoying junk and has asked about Featherweights. Can you drop the feeddogs on a Featherweight to free-motion quilt? And, we see more than one model number. Are some more likely to be reliable than others? She is so excited about creating quilts and I would love to help her find something that will let her stitch instead of struggle. Thank you kindly, Polly |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The ten questions I want you to answer | Jalynne | Beads | 19 | June 22nd 04 08:58 PM |
Questions About Hardanger | Suzanne | Needlework | 7 | April 23rd 04 11:49 PM |
Some additional questions | Steve Lamb | Beads | 15 | April 3rd 04 03:25 PM |
Special Needles for Singer Featherweight? | Beth Pierce | Quilting | 5 | March 12th 04 09:18 PM |
Featherweight accessory question | SandySmth | Quilting | 6 | November 13th 03 05:31 AM |