On Sep 29, 10:50 pm, William Black
wrote:
business, so they're 'family'. Nepotism is respectable in India and
jewellery design is not terribly difficult if what people want is 'more
of the same but slightly different engraving please'.

There are 2 sides for every coin. From one angle Nepotism is wrong as
it favors ones progeny. But, from another angle it is also duty of
one's parents to see that their children are well to do and stable
before letting them free hands. This keeps harmony and love amongst
society as well.

On the other hand *some people* on the pretext of Nepotism, leave
their children unattended in baby sittings, hostels and then spend
their time enjoying their own lives skipping their duties and even
take divorce multiple times. This makes the future citizens rude, and
careless. Children see their parents and follow their path.

But, certainly one has to know where to draw the line.....

One cannot actually use that when controlling a state. Also, to judge
if a son is not a better controller of the state just because his
father acquired it, would be foolish and unjustified to the son as
well. Would it be right on the part of the son if he is denied an
opportunity just because his father got one? what if he actually
deserved one?

Also, the progeny of a lion is a lion. That of a dog is a dog. That of
a cat is a cat. And, there's a good change of a artist to be an
artist. Some characteristics are transferred genetically. A good breed
of horse will give birth to a similar one. So, could be in case of a
business man as well.

So, before criticizing something one need to give a deep thought over
it.